Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1600\s+Model\s+Year\s+$Final\s+Question$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1600\s+Model\s+Year\s+$Final\s+Question$\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. 1600 Model Year (Final Question) (score: 1): Author: jon_wissler@pngc.com; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:57:00 -0800; Okie dokie, now that I have my facts straight, it's opinion time. What model year 1600 do most of you consider the "marquee" version of the genre? Aka the 67.5 2000. Is there any particular year that; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-03/msg00971.html (7,808 bytes)
2. Re: 1600 Model Year (Final Question) (score: 1): Author: Michael Poorboy <bitterrootprop@nidlink.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:07:25 -0800; Sounds like Jon might be getting another Roadster :-); /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-03/msg00972.html (8,163 bytes)
3. Re: 1600 Model Year (Final Question) (score: 1): Author: "Andrew Murphy" <solex67@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:27:53 -0800; As far as what 1600 is the "marquee" version of the 1600, you have to remember that Nissan made more of the 1600 low windhshield cars than any other model. I have had a 67.5 1600 and I liked the car; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-03/msg00973.html (9,550 bytes)
4. Re: 1600 Model Year (Final Question) (score: 1): Author: "Andrew Murphy" <solex67@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:28:03 -0800; As far as what 1600 is the "marquee" version of the 1600, you have to remember that Nissan made more of the 1600 low windhshield cars than any other model. I have had a 67.5 1600 and I liked the car; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-03/msg00974.html (9,652 bytes)
5. Re: 1600 Model Year (Final Question) (score: 1): Author: "sidney raper" <spl310@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 14:05:08 -0500; IMHO, the best 1600 was the 65 - 67(early) as it had the best dash (again MHO) and was unencumbered with the emission stuff. I kinda like the trim flares on the car and the straightline badging as we; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-03/msg00977.html (9,027 bytes)
6. Re: 1600 Model Year (Final Question) (score: 1): Author: Adam Bradley <ambradley@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 16:21:57 -0800 (PST); Just a note, there are two different 1967 models - the '67 and the '67.5. The "early" 1967 is virtually identical to the 1966, with the chrome trim rings, single brake master cylinder, etc. Adam Get; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-03/msg01008.html (10,975 bytes)
7. Re: 1600 Model Year (Final Question) (score: 1): Author: "Patrick J. Horne" <horne@cs.utexas.edu>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 20:08:44 -0600; I like my 67.5 1600. It has the flat dash with gauges that are divided in half, that is to say, the oil pressure and temp gauge are in one case, as are the fuel gauge and ammeter. It also has wider f; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-03/msg01019.html (8,488 bytes)
8. Re: 1600 Model Year (Final Question) (score: 1): Author: "Dave Stoll" <dgstoll@mint.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 21:31:43 -0800; The premier year for the 1600 was '70 because that's what I have daveS -- Original Message -- From: Andrew Murphy <solex67@hotmail.com> To: <jon_wissler@pngc.com> Cc: <datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-03/msg01024.html (10,301 bytes)
9. RE: 1600 Model Year (Final Question) (score: 1): Author: "Gordon Glasgow" <gsglasgow@home.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 20:41:50 -0800; I think the 67.5 is better because of the larger fender flares (more tire clearance), the dual-circuit brake master cylinder, and of course it is still low-windshield. YMMV. Gordon Glasgow Renton, WA; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-03/msg01031.html (8,867 bytes)
10. Re: 1600 Model Year (Final Question) (score: 1): Author: CalSpeed@aol.com; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 23:58:30 EST; Oooops...! The 67.5 2000 had the flared fenders too. Calspeed; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-03/msg01036.html (8,227 bytes)
11. Re: 1600 Model Year (Final Question) (score: 1): Author: JRDMF@aol.com; Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 01:19:28 EST; Maybe they did make more 1600's in 67.5, but lets not forget how many of those cars gave up there lives to become "original" 67.5 Solex cars...........(Not!) Just a thought. Jon Frampton 67.5 1600 (r; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-03/msg01037.html (8,198 bytes)
12. Re: 1600 Model Year (Final Question) (score: 1): Author: "Pam & Paul Bauman" <plhbauman@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 23:00:23 -0800; Hey, if whoever is doing this keeps it up, we can all own two or three of the rarest roadsters around :) Paul Bauman Westminster, CA 67 1600 http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumIndex?u=881168&a=64995; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-03/msg01038.html (8,699 bytes)
13. RE: 1600 Model Year (Final Question) (score: 1): Author: Bamandpeb@aol.com; Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 02:15:29 EST; For street driving, the 66 is the prettiest, the 69 is the most practical. For racing, the 67.5 is the lightest. Dan & Susan << I think the 67.5 is better because of the larger fender flares (more ti; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-03/msg01040.html (8,224 bytes)
14. Re: 1600 Model Year (Final Question) (score: 1): Author: jon_wissler@pngc.com; Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:50:31 -0800; Andrew and list, So how big an advantage is the dual circuit versus single brake master cylinder between the 66 and 67.5 1600's? Sounds like an improvement, but what do I know. I do like the wider fe; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-03/msg01090.html (10,475 bytes)
15. Re[2]: 1600 Model Year (Final Question) (score: 1): Author: Fred_Katz@ci.sf.ca.us; Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 17:21:58 -0800; Come to Shasta and see a LOT of cars up close! July 6th/7th. Fred Andrew and list, So how big an advantage is the dual circuit versus single brake master cylinder between the 66 and 67.5 1600's? Soun; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-03/msg01096.html (10,781 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]