Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1600\s+R\s+engine\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1600\s+R\s+engine\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. 1600 R engine (score: 1): Author: "Deena Petrie" <dpetrie@megsinet.net>; Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 20:51:00 -0500; Hi everyone, First I would like to thank everyone for there help on finding a donor body for my 69 1600. I would like to know if there is a way to get more power out of the R engines by putting in a; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-08/msg00882.html (7,486 bytes)
2. Re: 1600 R engine (score: 1): Author: "Victor Laury" <vlaury@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 19:52:40 -0700; engines by putting in a bigger cam. Deena, Make sure it's tuned and the engine is performing to the specs. That's my best suggestion. The engine is designed to give the best all-around performance.; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-08/msg00885.html (8,527 bytes)
3. RE: 1600 R engine (score: 1): Author: "Pam & Paul Bauman" <plhbauman@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 20:03:02 -0700; engines by putting in a bigger cam. Deena, Make sure it's tuned and the engine is performing to the specs. That's my best suggestion. The engine is designed to give the best all-around performance.; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-08/msg00888.html (8,730 bytes)
4. Re: 1600 R engine (score: 1): Author: "Edgar Gonzalez" <spl212@home.com>; Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 20:07:24 -0700; Hi list, Being a new Roadster enthusiast I am thankful for all the recent "talk" about the 1600 engine. I will retain my original 1600 engine. since I have begun my 69 1600 restoration I've been losi; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-08/msg00889.html (9,526 bytes)
5. Re: 1600 R engine (score: 1): Author: "datsunmike" <datsunmike@nyc.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2001 06:39:41 -0400; If you can get a 5 speed get one. It's a better tranny and really brings the revs down on the highway. If you stick with the 4 speed, rebuild it before putting it back in the car or at least carefull; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-08/msg00898.html (10,542 bytes)
6. Re: 1600 R engine (score: 1): Author: "Deena Petrie" <dpetrie@megsinet.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2001 10:58:05 -0500; Thanks to all for the input. I would prefer to leave it the way its supposed to be. I have to worry about putting the body back together again first before working on the engine. Thank again Deena 69; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-08/msg00908.html (8,854 bytes)
7. Re: 1600 R engine (score: 1): Author: "Dave Stoll" <dgstoll@mint.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2001 11:18:40 -0400; My 1600 with 4 speed is nice around town and easily cruises at 80 so why change except for the sake of change itself. If I blew my 4spd and had an extra 5 spd, I'd probably have different ideas.... d; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-08/msg00929.html (10,404 bytes)
8. Re: 1600 R engine (score: 1): Author: "datsunmike" <datsunmike@nyc.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 07:02:15 -0400; I had to pull my 4 speed as it had a bad synchro and instead installed a rebuilt 5 speed. It is a better tranny although for stock 1600s 1st gear is pretty high and you have to slip the clutch more; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-08/msg00934.html (11,860 bytes)
9. Re: 1600 R engine (score: 1): Author: "John F Sandhoff" <sandhoff@csus.edu>; Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:21:46 -0700; It was asked: Well, you didn't comment on the most important question: What is the intended use of the car? If you're building an around-town cruiser, IMHO the 4 speed is a nice tranny. Light, clean; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-08/msg00956.html (8,589 bytes)
10. Re: 1600 R engine (score: 1): Author: "Edgar Gonzalez" <datsunspl311@home.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 19:49:05 -0700; I supposed I'll have to try both and make up my mind. :-) I'll probably start with the 4 speed, see how it goes, and then decide to do the 5 speed. I anticipate driving on the freeway quite a bit. So; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-08/msg00985.html (9,408 bytes)
11. Re: 1600 R engine (score: 1): Author: "Daryl Smith" <darylsmith@telus.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 20:25:54 -0700; I have been thinking on trying the 3.7 rear diff with the 4 spd. Not as big a change in the 1st gear and a slightly better top speed (on paper anyway). Has anyone tried this? Daryl '66 1600 speed. or; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-08/msg00989.html (10,214 bytes)
12. Re: 1600 R engine (score: 1): Author: "datsunmike" <datsunmike@nyc.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 06:37:15 -0400; Do yourself a favor and rip apart the tranny and replace the synchros and inspect the countergear and replace the countershaft bearings and shaft. You don't want to have to rip your tranny again beca; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-08/msg01000.html (10,395 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]