Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1928\-29\s+Ford\s+Roadster\s+bodies\s+in\s+LSR\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1928\-29\s+Ford\s+Roadster\s+bodies\s+in\s+LSR\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. Re: 1928-29 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>; Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:58:59 -0700; Trailing streamlining is very critical. Look at any airplane. After many years in the timing stand and watching chute deployment, it's very interesting to see how chutes works on different cars. This; /html/land-speed/2005-01/msg00027.html (8,950 bytes)
2. Re: 1928-29 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: Bryan Savage <b.a.savage@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 21:18:03 -0800; You said " I guess I got a little off subject". I think it is a good thing to do. After all, "Saving Your Life" is a subject of interest to everyone I know. Your description of how chute behavior ca; /html/land-speed/2005-01/msg00029.html (8,138 bytes)
3. Re: 1928-29 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <saltracer@servusa.com>; Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:51:53 -0500; Wouldn't that be rear steer??; /html/land-speed/2005-01/msg00030.html (8,633 bytes)
4. Re: 1928-29 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: "J D Tone" <gmc6power@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 23:02:07 -0800; rear steer is not allowed, is it John....; /html/land-speed/2005-01/msg00032.html (7,948 bytes)
5. RE: 1928-29 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: Dale.Clay@mdhelicopters.com; Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 08:29:53 -0700; I seem to remember an old photo of a roadster in that configuration ... nothing new under the sun. Dale C. It has come to my attention that an ingenious individual is reading our new rules on rear en; /html/land-speed/2005-01/msg00064.html (8,434 bytes)
6. Re: 1928-29 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: john robinson <john@engr.wisc.edu>; Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 10:45:49 -0600; it is disappointing that the unlimited innovation of LSR has seen fit to limit rear steer..... how's it going JD? I got back from the Antarctic without freezing any important parts.... am now working; /html/land-speed/2005-01/msg00066.html (8,715 bytes)
7. Re: 1928-29 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: Flowbench@aol.com; Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 12:42:45 EST; JD when the 4 wheel drive roadsters are legislated out of the rules and rear engine modifieds are given a class I just have to shake my head. Mike; /html/land-speed/2005-01/msg00068.html (7,866 bytes)
8. Re: 1928-29 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: Flowbench@aol.com; Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 12:38:06 EST; It seems to me that several people built "rear engined" cars that were not legal and got a class to run in. So your point is? Mike; /html/land-speed/2005-01/msg00069.html (7,678 bytes)
9. RE: 1928-29 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: john robinson <john@engr.wisc.edu>; Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 12:08:39 -0600; my comment on the rear steer was mostly tongue in cheek.....I think it CAN be done, but needs fly by wire to do so....and that the powers that be will not allow yet, at least until the latest MB show; /html/land-speed/2005-01/msg00072.html (8,363 bytes)
10. Re: 1928-29 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: Flowbench@aol.com; Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 17:08:45 EST; It has come to my attention that an ingenious individual is reading our new rules on rear engine modified roadster and has decided that it doesn't say anywhere in the rules that the car needs to face; /html/land-speed/2004-12/msg00424.html (8,029 bytes)
11. Re: 1928-29 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 15:33:55 -0700; This was done in the early 50s as well, I have a picture of it somewhere in my files. Glen -- Original Message -- From: <Flowbench@aol.com> To: <ddahlgren@snet.net>; <James.Tone@AES.com>; <land-spee; /html/land-speed/2004-12/msg00425.html (8,658 bytes)
12. RE: 1928-29 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: "James Tone" <James.Tone@AES.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 14:38:49 -0800; As long as he has a rear view mirror and likes to drive backwards I can't see a problem. :-) _____ It has come to my attention that an ingenious individual is reading our new rules on rear engine mod; /html/land-speed/2004-12/msg00426.html (9,587 bytes)
13. Re: 1928-29 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: wester6935@comcast.net; Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 00:55:29 +0000; I think this has been tried before. Perhaps even at the lakes in post WWII if I remember correctly. Wes; /html/land-speed/2004-12/msg00427.html (8,576 bytes)
14. Re: 1928-29 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 18:15:45 -0700; I have a picture of the roadster that ran late 40s early 50s. Will try to find it and scan it for those who are interestd. Glen -- Original Message --; /html/land-speed/2004-12/msg00428.html (9,115 bytes)
15. Re: 1928-29 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: ARDUNDOUG@aol.com; Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 21:34:49 EST; I'd question whether the ass-end of a 27 T roadster is very aerodynamic compared to the needle-nose front-end streamlining allowed in Modified Roadster.....Ardun Doug; /html/land-speed/2004-12/msg00429.html (8,858 bytes)
16. Re: 1928-29 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: Flowbench@aol.com; Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 00:03:08 EST; Ken Walkey's liner & the Summers Bros. Pollywog might be two thoughts leading one to think about a different approach. Mike; /html/land-speed/2004-12/msg00430.html (8,662 bytes)
17. Re: 1928-29 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: Flowbench@aol.com; Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 00:09:58 EST; No propeller but forklift steering, what a concept! Mike; /html/land-speed/2004-12/msg00431.html (8,571 bytes)
18. Re: 1928-29 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: ARDUNDOUG@aol.com; Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 01:21:51 EST; Lotsa difference between the front-end aerodynamics of Walkeys 'liner and the ass-end aerodynamics of a 27. The 27 rear end more closely resembles the front of a 40's car. Walkey's car and the Polywo; /html/land-speed/2004-12/msg00433.html (8,991 bytes)
19. RE: 1928-29 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 05:09:47 -0500; I would not question it too long. base drag at the back costs a lot more than anything you might do in the front with a needle nose from what I have read. it would not be the first car that was bett; /html/land-speed/2004-12/msg00434.html (10,174 bytes)
20. Re: 1928-29 Ford Roadster bodies in LSR (score: 1): Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 07:15:58 -0800; Bob Pierson told me that they mounted a '27 modified roadster body rear forward on a bet and it did go faster. You can take that for what it is worth! I understand that managing the air behind the ca; /html/land-speed/2004-12/msg00436.html (9,142 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]