Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1962\s+TR4\s+v\s+1962\s+Herald\/Vitesse\s+comparisons\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1962\s+TR4\s+v\s+1962\s+Herald\/Vitesse\s+comparisons\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. 1962 TR4 v 1962 Herald/Vitesse comparisons (score: 1): Author: Guyots3@wmconnect.com; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:53:23 EST; Hi Joe & others, TR4 Wheelbase: 88" Width: 58.25" Track: (front with disc wheels): 49" Track: (front with wire wheels): 50" Track: (rear with disc wheels): 48" Track: (rear with wire wheels): 49" Len; /html/fot/2004-02/msg00351.html (8,087 bytes)
2. RE: 1962 TR4 v 1962 Herald/Vitesse comparisons (score: 1): Author: "Randall Young" <ryoung@navcomtech.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:51:30 -0800; Not that it matters a great deal, I'm sure Joe knows this ... but the TR4's standard engine was 2138cc rated at 105bhp and 128 ft-lb. The 1991cc was available as a not-very-popular option. Randall; /html/fot/2004-02/msg00353.html (7,102 bytes)
3. Re: 1962 TR4 v 1962 Herald/Vitesse comparisons (score: 1): Author: elliottd <elliott@videotron.ca>; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 18:05:18 -0500; In the 1964 Shell 4000 Rally, the 3 Works TR4's that Kas prepared with Oregon plates had 1991 cc displacement to be in the under 2 litre class. Don Elliot, 1953 TR3A (finisher in a Renault R8 in that; /html/fot/2004-02/msg00355.html (7,555 bytes)
4. Re: 1962 TR4 v 1962 Herald/Vitesse comparisons (score: 1): Author: Guyots3@wmconnect.com; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 21:49:35 EST; I doubt it too, although the power to weight ratio should be pretty good! And of course, the Bond is a rare animal, even in standard form. Your main concern apart from strength and alignment of body; /html/fot/2004-02/msg00361.html (7,903 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]