Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\"\s+Carburetor\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\"\s+Carburetor\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. 2" Carburetor (score: 1): Author: "Richard Taylor" <tarch@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 14:23:35 -0500; OK Jack, Since you now seem be the target of choice for carburetor/manifold queries, permit me to pose one more. As you know my racing M.O. has always been subject to a certain amount of, well let's; /html/fot/2003-12/msg00050.html (8,290 bytes)
2. Re: 2" Carburetor (score: 1): Author: "R. John Lye" <rjl@gt-classics.com>; Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 17:03:39 -0500; Hi Richard, I'm (obviously) not Jack, but I can tell you of our experience trying to get 2" SU's to work on Chip Bond's E-Prod TR-4. He spent a lot of dyno time with those carbs, and the engine was m; /html/fot/2003-12/msg00051.html (7,553 bytes)
3. Re: 2" Carburetor (score: 1): Author: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>; Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 16:55:16 -0600; Uh-oh. I smell trouble here. Your approach looks like a lot of fun, but I've always wondered if you'd do the same thing under different medication. In keeping with my policy of trying to keep genuine; /html/fot/2003-12/msg00053.html (9,705 bytes)
4. Re: 2" Carburetor (score: 1): Author: "kas kastner" <kaskas@cox.net>; Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 16:00:15 -0800; They'll probably work great if you have a rev range between 5500 and 9000. Velocity, you don't have the cubes, so do it with revs......only way out. -- Original Message -- From: "R. John Lye" <rjl@gt; /html/fot/2003-12/msg00054.html (8,029 bytes)
5. RE: 2" Carburetor (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 18:53:08 -0800; I think there's a simple problem there. You're bolting the carbs to a sucko manifold. You might as well be doing the tuning to the next car over--the manifold is negating all your work. Hi Richard, I; /html/fot/2003-12/msg00056.html (7,910 bytes)
6. Re: 2" Carburetor (score: 1): Author: Henry Frye <henry@henryfrye.com>; Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 07:05:33 -0500; I know there are at least a few FOT who are pilots like me, with their ticket accumulating cobwebs. Probably has something to do with fact that all discretionary income is now spent on things that go; /html/fot/2003-12/msg00059.html (7,644 bytes)
7. Re: 2" Carburetor (score: 1): Author: "A.J.Wood" <wood@dandrade.freeserve.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 02:24:45 -0000; 2" SU's need to be properly suspended (very sorry all, but no more parts available for this job at present). Add a 4A manifold,long rams,& UL needles & enjoy. Quicker than Webers. Jon Wood -- Origina; /html/fot/2003-12/msg00069.html (8,829 bytes)
8. Re: 2" Carburetor (score: 1): Author: Ryan Miles <rjhmile@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 21:29:51 -0800 (PST); Fellow FOT, You will have to excuse my ignorance here if this is way off base.... Has anyone thought of trying the 1.5" ZS carbs (i believe these exist) on richard goods triple manifold? This is obvi; /html/fot/2003-12/msg00075.html (7,585 bytes)
9. Re: 2" Carburetor (score: 1): Author: Ted Schumacher <tedtsimx@bright.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 14:19:23 -0500; John, sorry to be late in replying but you are absolutely correct. One of the best small engine builders/cylinder head shops was a company called Comptune here in Ohio. Dave Tabor was the owner and a; /html/fot/2003-12/msg00143.html (8,599 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]