Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\.2\s+Litre\s+MGB\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\.2\s+Litre\s+MGB\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. 2.2 Litre MGB (score: 1): Author: "Brinkman, Gerardo V" <GB127167@exchange.DAYTONOH.NCR.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 10:11:32 -0500; I was in the UK last week and noticed that the MGOC has developed a 2.2L engine for the MGB. They have built a stoked crank which increases the displacement. Looked impressive with a stage 2 head (ne; /html/mgs/2002-03/msg00858.html (7,725 bytes)
2. RE: 2.2 Litre MGB (score: 1): Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 10:30:36 -0800; The engine is bored with the bores offset, so core penetration is not such a problem. The crank is also offset ground to give the longer stroke. Any "good" machine shop can duplicate this job, as it; /html/mgs/2002-03/msg00867.html (8,932 bytes)
3. Re: 2.2 Litre MGB (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:36:42 EST; Dodgy cast iron that weeps coolant into the cylinders is a problem with too large a bore, as is insufficient head gasket material unless the bores are offset. I have done larger, but advise people to; /html/mgs/2002-03/msg00894.html (9,937 bytes)
4. Re: 2.2 Litre MGB (score: 1): Author: "james" <jamesnazarian@netzero.net>; Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 00:04:01 -0700; i read the article as well, bearing in mind that this is Mike(?) Pierce of Pierce manifolds. The guts of the engine are all high zoot stuff. The engine makes 172hp and pulls to 8000rpm. It has Pierce; /html/mgs/2002-03/msg00903.html (8,976 bytes)
5. Re: 2.2 Litre MGB (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 08:45:56 EST; Comes alive at 6500? Driveable??? Methinks a contradiction lurks, nay prances through that statement! The 'cammines' of such an engine, and the lower end figures you'll find, preclude the sort of fle; /html/mgs/2002-03/msg00905.html (7,903 bytes)
6. Re: 2.2 Litre MGB (score: 1): Author: "Kai M. Radicke" <kmr@pil.net>; Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 12:48:22 -0500; Well afterall, the article did appear in GRM... and we all know what the content of GRM is worth. Of course, most magazines that advance date their publications by three months are a dead give away; /html/mgs/2002-03/msg00912.html (8,373 bytes)
7. Re: 2.2 Litre MGB (score: 1): Author: "Paul T. Root" <proot@horton.iaces.com>; Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 11:44:47 -0600; Well the GRM are all about racing on a budget. Comfort means little to them. But I have to take issue with your remarks about them. I've had a subscription for 3 years now. And I've pretty much quit; /html/mgs/2002-03/msg00915.html (8,619 bytes)
8. Re: 2.2 Litre MGB (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 22:42:13 EST; A fully done overbore (c. 1800cc) Twincam engine with suitable cams, Webers, head work and around 13.5:1 compression is capable of that, and has been done - many years ago! You had to use it to aroun; /html/mgs/2002-03/msg00934.html (8,378 bytes)
9. Re: 2.2 Litre MGB (score: 1): Author: "james" <jamesnazarian@netzero.net>; Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 00:21:43 -0700; james /// /// mgs@autox.team.net mailing list /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool ///; /html/mgs/2002-03/msg00939.html (7,824 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]