- 1. 2.88 gears/Posi (score: 1)
- Author: gary_winblad@juno.com (Gary A Winblad)
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 21:49:02 PST
- YES, Chad has it correct. No problem for our rear-end guy. I was pretty sure I read about some problem in some old tech tip but he didn't have any problem. I think it might have been that you needed
- /html/tigers/1996-07/msg00288.html (7,238 bytes)
- 2. Re: 2.88 gears/Posi (score: 1)
- Author: LeBrun@hii.hitachi.com
- Date: Fri, 26 Jul 96 09:14:35 PST
- -You're gonna' run 2.88's with a 5-speed? You'll have the very first 200 MPH/@2,000 RPM TIGER ever seen. Have you thought of BONNEVILLE SPEED WEEK? Phil YES, Chad has it correct. No problem for our
- /html/tigers/1996-07/msg00301.html (7,757 bytes)
- 3. Re: 2.88 gears/Posi (score: 1)
- Author: lrw@aop.com (LARRY WRIGHT)
- Date: Fri, 26 Jul 96 13:19 EDT
- 2nd, perhaps. BTW, 5th isn't really useful around town, like it would be in an econobox. The V8 _will_ pull O.K. from those low rpms, but the chug-chug-chug emitted is embarrasing. Larry Wright, Mar
- /html/tigers/1996-07/msg00305.html (7,276 bytes)
- 4. Re[2]: 2.88 gears/Posi (score: 1)
- Author: LeBrun@hii.hitachi.com
- Date: Fri, 26 Jul 96 10:44:05 PST
- -Also not real conducive to maintaining rod bearings. From what I vaguely remember(engine Physics whiz's help here)when a gas engine lugs, there are 2 major forces attacking the connecting rods. 1),
- /html/tigers/1996-07/msg00307.html (7,374 bytes)
- 5. Re: 2.88 gears/Posi (score: 1)
- Author: gary_winblad@juno.com (Gary A Winblad)
- Date: Mon, 29 Jul 1996 23:05:35 PST
- Yeah, and I'm a gonna get good mileage while I'm at it too. But for the time being, I'm going to run the close ratio top-loader where I wouldn't want to drive anywhere with lower than 2.88's, hell,
- /html/tigers/1996-07/msg00350.html (7,071 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu