Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\s+\-\s+Re\:\s+Fw\:\s+BMC\s+Gold\s+\&Silver\s+Seals\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\s+\-\s+Re\:\s+Fw\:\s+BMC\s+Gold\s+\&Silver\s+Seals\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. 2 - Re: Fw: BMC Gold &Silver Seals (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 12:46:59 EST; So, as I said earlier (or meant to) gold seal did NOT mean all new parts. Daniel1312 << in a re-conditioned case. >>; /html/spridgets/2001-01/msg00069.html (6,643 bytes)
2. Re: 2 - Re: Fw: BMC Gold &Silver Seals (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 11:08:50 -0700; I don't mean to argumentative, but my understanding has always been that Gold=new period, else why bother to differentiate Gold and Silver replacements? Dave@Taos Garage Annex in Albuquerque 59 AH :; /html/spridgets/2001-01/msg00071.html (7,664 bytes)
3. Re: 2 - Re: Fw: BMC Gold &Silver Seals (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 21:07:36 -0000; I agree with Daniel, in fact in the UK my impression was that the (lower quality re-build) "Silver Seal" standard never real caught on because "Gold Seal" was just a better deal. But I just wonder if; /html/spridgets/2001-01/msg00076.html (6,779 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]