Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\s+Re\:\s+Wasting\s+Bandwidth\?\s+\-\s+long\,\s+no\s+LBC\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\s+Re\:\s+Wasting\s+Bandwidth\?\s+\-\s+long\,\s+no\s+LBC\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. 2 Re: Wasting Bandwidth? - long, no LBC (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 13:10:22 EST; I have been on and off the list for a couple of years now. Usually I leave the list when life in general gets too busy. I have seen complaints from time to time about non LBC messages and my response; /html/spridgets/2001-02/msg00195.html (9,094 bytes)
2. 2 Re: Wasting Bandwidth? - long, no LBC (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 14:29:55 -0500; Here, Here, Daniel, Right on. Thanks Paul A Re: 2 Re: Wasting Bandwidth? - long, no LBC I have been on and off the list for a couple of years now. Usually I leave the list when life in general gets t; /html/spridgets/2001-02/msg00203.html (10,182 bytes)
3. 2 Re: Wasting Bandwidth? - long, no LBC (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 13:51:38 -0600; Let me add to what Daniel said. I will give freely my time and effort to friends, as I'm sure most people do. Through this list I have "met" people either in person or in the flying electrons who I f; /html/spridgets/2001-02/msg00204.html (7,309 bytes)
4. Re: 2 Re: Wasting Bandwidth? - long, no LBC (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:51:27 EST; << If the thread says NO LBC and there are 30 messages that follow it with NO LBC is this really a hardship to delete the messages? I have also obvserved that every person (inc Montana Bob) who compl; /html/spridgets/2001-02/msg00258.html (7,539 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]