Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2000\s+Celica\s+GT\-S\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2000\s+Celica\s+GT\-S\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. Re: 2000 Celica GT-S (score: 1): Author: "Gary McDaniel" <mcnjohn@sierratel.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 08:04:23 -0800; Humor me here please....what is a "DSM"? Overall I think; /html/autox/1999-12/msg00016.html (7,578 bytes)
2. Re: 2000 Celica GT-S (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 14:34:14 -0500; Only the ground-poundingest, neck-snappingest, nasty-ass fastest piece of automotive machinery ever made and sold under $35K, CAN. In other words, an Eagle Talon, Mitsubishi Eclipse, or Plymouth Lase; /html/autox/1999-12/msg00032.html (7,773 bytes)
3. Re: 2000 Celica GT-S (score: 1): Author: "Mike Healy" <mapman1138@interaccess.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 13:42:23 -0600; A little post-lunch, on the job drinking goin' on over there? Could ya send some my way? ;o) Mike Healy wondering; /html/autox/1999-12/msg00035.html (8,349 bytes)
4. Re: 2000 Celica GT-S (score: 1): Author: "Brad Cox" <coxb@trimofran.org>; Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 13:47:42 -0600; While we're off topic and talking about new cars...8) How about the new Eclipse? Is it still in GS? How do you thing it will measure up to the GT-S? -brad; /html/autox/1999-12/msg00036.html (7,565 bytes)
5. Re: 2000 Celica GT-S (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 15:11:30 -0500; Nahh, too much coding today. Need to blow off some steam. Hmmm... "Dominates Street Modified" (I like this one) "Defeats Slow Mustangs" (Aren't they all?) "Doesn't Smoke - Much" (*sniff sniff* Is th; /html/autox/1999-12/msg00039.html (7,959 bytes)
6. RE: 2000 Celica GT-S (score: 1): Author: "Isley, Jason C." <JIsley@cell1.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 13:10:36 -0700; MACHINE Jason Isley jisley@cell1.com send Nahh, too much coding today. Need to blow off some steam. Hmmm... "Dominates Street Modified" (I like this one) "Defeats Slow Mustangs" (Aren't they all?) "; /html/autox/1999-12/msg00041.html (8,321 bytes)
7. Re: 2000 Celica GT-S (score: 1): Author: Josh Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 13:59:55 -0700; Lousy, if it's at all like it is on paper. It'll measure up more with the Probe/MX-6 cars. A V6 front-driver with no limited slip? Can you say "oink"? IMHO, I think the decision to discontinue the AW; /html/autox/1999-12/msg00042.html (8,254 bytes)
8. Re: 2000 Celica GT-S (score: 1): Author: "Brad Cox" <coxb@trimofran.org>; Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 14:35:09 -0600; Yup. Not even worthy of it's comparison to a squirrel's butt... I actually saw one the other day. It reminded me of a premie 3000GT. -brad; /html/autox/1999-12/msg00044.html (7,626 bytes)
9. Re: 2000 Celica GT-S (score: 1): Author: "Thana, Peter {High~Palo Alto}" <PETER.THANA@ROCHE.COM>; Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 11:26:21 -0800; Back to the original topic for a minute... I drove one last night for the heck of it. Must agree with the previous posts. Handling seems great, but the engine is surprisingly loud, gutless, and ugly-; /html/autox/1999-12/msg00116.html (8,374 bytes)
10. Re: 2000 Celica GT-S (score: 1): Author: "Chris Marsh" <cmarsh90@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 12:26:38 PST; I haven't driven one of these things but checked one out and noticed that essentially the entire engine sits forward of the front axle, seems to me weight distribution on this thing might not be so g; /html/autox/1999-12/msg00121.html (8,804 bytes)
11. Re: 2000 Celica GT-S (score: 1): Author: Jamie Sculerati <jamies@mrj.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 16:05:28 -0500 (EST); That's a layout common to just about every transverse-engine front-driver ever made -- and unless someone figures out how to put the exhaust header and the transaxle on the same side of the engine, i; /html/autox/1999-12/msg00124.html (8,198 bytes)
12. Re: 2000 Celica GT-S (score: 1): Author: "Chris Marsh" <cmarsh90@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 13:38:14 PST; Being an Integra Type R owner I'm well aware of this, but it seemed to me on the Celica that he engine was FURTHER forward than in most other FF cars I have knowledge of. Chris Marsh; /html/autox/1999-12/msg00125.html (8,253 bytes)
13. RE: 2000 Celica GT-S (score: 1): Author: "Thana, Peter {High~Palo Alto}" <PETER.THANA@ROCHE.COM>; Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 16:18:41 -0800; This whole discussion made me think of one of the most bizarre cars you could ever consider autocrossing, the GM EV1. It has something like 16 lead acid or NiMH batteries arranged in a T-configurati; /html/autox/1999-12/msg00137.html (9,922 bytes)
14. RE: 2000 Celica GT-S (score: 1): Author: Jonathan Dove <JDOVE@gsvms2.cc.gasou.edu>; Date: Fri, 3 Dec 1999 16:23:37 -0500; If they are 13" tires you may be in luck! The last time I checked Kumho's Korean web site they do make a 175/60-13 tire. Don't think it imported to the US though. Jonathan jdove@gsvms2.cc.gasou.edu; /html/autox/1999-12/msg00215.html (7,642 bytes)
15. 2000 Celica GT-S (score: 1): Author: Alan Pozner <AlanP@identicard.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 19:41:04 -0500; First off, I was wondering if anyone out there has an opinion on the 2000 Celica GT-S. I read that the SCCA has classified it in G Stock. I recently drove one of these things, and I think this car is; /html/autox/1999-11/msg01265.html (9,242 bytes)
16. Re: 2000 Celica GT-S (score: 1): Author: "JCGZ3" <jcgz3@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 20:02:33 -0800; No chance against a Type-R or Talon. No limited slip, No sport suspension, and it has the specs of an MX6. --JCG -- Original Message -- From: Alan Pozner <AlanP@identicard.com> To: <carguychris@hotma; /html/autox/1999-11/msg01285.html (10,299 bytes)
17. Re: 2000 Celica GT-S (score: 1): Author: "Chris Walton" <carguychris@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 20:43:28 PST; Okay, just a few more notes on my GT-S vs. Type R "bench race"... 8-) Okay, well maybe I was overstating it a little bit, but that's a good way to start a discussion on lists like this one 8-) 8-) T; /html/autox/1999-11/msg01289.html (10,532 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]