- 1. Re: 2001 PAX Index - Sirota - go to work! (score: 1)
- Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@Kingston.com
- Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:41:25 -0800
- Work your magic baby! AB "Dave Beck" <DBSB80@msn.com>@autox.team.net on 01/15/2001 08:50:55 PM Please respond to "Dave Beck" <DBSB80@msn.com> Sent by: owner-autox@autox.team.net To: "Team.Net" <autox
- /html/autox/2001-01/msg00290.html (7,600 bytes)
- 2. Re: 2001 PAX Index - Sirota - go to work! (score: 1)
- Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:43:06 -0500
- Geez, can't a guy take a day off? What follows are three comparisons -- 2000 RTP to 2001 RTP, 2000 PAX to 2001 PAX, and 2001 PAX to 2001 RTP. In all cases, classes towards the top are "tougher" than
- /html/autox/2001-01/msg00300.html (7,389 bytes)
- 3. Re: 2001 PAX Index - Sirota - go to work! (score: 1)
- Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:17:08 -0500
- In Beck's defense, the quickest SM-legal car right now is probably a CSP Civic or BSP M3. The M3 was moved from C/SP because it wasn't believed to be competitive with the top CSP cars. The Civic hasn
- /html/autox/2001-01/msg00308.html (7,872 bytes)
- 4. Re: 2001 PAX Index - Sirota - go to work! (score: 1)
- Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@Kingston.com
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 12:45:23 -0800
- I disagree. You sort of make the counter-point in your text. If the CSP Civic isn't even the car for the class anymore, then it should be easier for one to dominate that PAX number. Go to full race c
- /html/autox/2001-01/msg00312.html (8,810 bytes)
- 5. Re: 2001 PAX Index - Sirota - go to work! (score: 1)
- Author: "Mr. DSM" <mrdsm@excite.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 11:26:46 -0800 (PST)
- So, ESP had a lower PAX for the 2000 and had to be corrected (thanks Bob :). But, even without M3s in there for the 2001, correction had to be done! Interesting! On the other side, SS got a new fanci
- /html/autox/2001-01/msg00357.html (7,360 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu