Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*25D4\s+vs\.\s+45D4\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*25D4\s+vs\.\s+45D4\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. 25D4 vs. 45D4 (score: 1): Author: Todd Mullins <muses@cableone.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 09:38:15 -0500; Hi all, I've been slowly gathering parts for my '74 MGB reassembly. My emphasis is on optimizing functionality and performance, rather than a historically correct restoration. Years ago, I remember r; /html/mgs/2006-07/msg00201.html (7,407 bytes)
2. Re: 25D4 vs. 45D4 (score: 1): Author: Charles & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 17:59:11 -0500; Go to http://www.mgb-stuff.org.uk/curvestext.htm and look up your dizzy by serial #. Hopefully you got one with a curve that will be OK for your engine. BTW, I use a 25D4 #40897 in my '69 B. Still us; /html/mgs/2006-07/msg00207.html (7,423 bytes)
3. Re: 25D4 vs. 45D4 (score: 1): Author: Todd Mullins <muses@cableone.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 20:43:50 -0500; Well, um, here's the other interesting part of this story: There are no numbers on it anywhere. Weird, huh? No numbers on the body. No numbers on the vacuum canister. I took it all apart, looking for; /html/mgs/2006-07/msg00209.html (8,040 bytes)
4. RE: 25D4 vs. 45D4 (score: 1): Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 12:38:26 -0700; You remembered correctly. The 45D is technically superior to the 25D design, especially when fitted with points. In general the cap and rotor re-design makes the unit less prone to carbon tracking m; /html/mgs/2006-07/msg00225.html (10,114 bytes)
5. Re: 25D4 vs. 45D4 (score: 1): Author: Charles & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:12:22 -0500; You could take it to a shop with a dizzy machine and plot the curve, including the vac unit; then compare it to the 25D4 that you have already. Hope you haven't wasted your $$. Cheers, CR; /html/mgs/2006-07/msg00226.html (9,597 bytes)
6. Re: 25D4 vs. 45D4 (score: 1): Author: Charles & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 18:54:32 -0500; Gee Kelvin, Is this the repro that Moss has for sale? ;^) CR; /html/mgs/2006-07/msg00227.html (9,127 bytes)
7. Re: 25D4 vs. 45D4 (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:00:05 +0100; As I recall the wiping points is a feature of the 45D, as all the ones I have seen have the pin on the vacuum advance plate that moves the white plastic slotted piece on the bottom of the points, whi; /html/mgs/2006-07/msg00228.html (8,321 bytes)
8. Re: 25D4 vs. 45D4 (score: 1): Author: "Peter C." <nosimport@mailbag.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 10:23:31 -0500; Guys, Is there a side entry cap for the 45D4? Lucas part number?; /html/mgs/2006-07/msg00229.html (8,486 bytes)
9. Re: 25D4 vs. 45D4 (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:47:56 +0100; Do a Google for 45D4 side-entry. -- Original Message --; /html/mgs/2006-07/msg00231.html (7,582 bytes)
10. RE: 25D4 vs. 45D4 (score: 1): Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 09:36:29 -0700; I have seen a side entry cap for the 45D. It was a push in type. Sorry, but no leads on availability. Kelvin. Guys, Is there a side entry cap for the 45D4? Lucas part number? I the all 45D points se; /html/mgs/2006-07/msg00232.html (8,841 bytes)
11. RE: 25D4 vs. 45D4 (score: 1): Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 10:13:37 -0700; The two point sets for the 45D are pretty different. The type used on the Federal 45D4 on 1975 vehicles and the original Lucas 41427 is the DSB108. This point set looks pretty much like the old DSB1; /html/mgs/2006-07/msg00233.html (9,306 bytes)
12. RE: 25D4 vs. 45D4 (score: 1): Author: <rcady@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 07:28:15 -0500 (CDT); Has anyone on list purchased the Lucas replica 45D4 destributor as available on page 5 of the Roadster Factory's glovebox companion? My concern is that they do not appear to carry replacement caps an; /html/mgs/2006-07/msg00251.html (7,831 bytes)
13. Re: 25D4 vs. 45D4 (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 14:17:51 +0100; The ground wire is usually secured under the screw that holds the points plate base in place. This is recessed into the body of the distributor (the ones I have at any rate) and needs no cut-out in t; /html/mgs/2006-07/msg00253.html (7,864 bytes)
14. RE: 25D4 vs. 45D4 (score: 1): Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 09:45:01 -0700; The replica 45D4 uses the standard 45D cap and rotor used on all later MGBs. Their tech department is probably as overloaded as our tech department is. : ) Kelvin Dodd Has anyone on list purchased t; /html/mgs/2006-07/msg00257.html (8,226 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]