Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*260\s+cylinder\s+heads\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*260\s+cylinder\s+heads\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. 260 cylinder heads (score: 1): Author: "Doug & Rett Leithauser" <dleit@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 09:37:28 -0500; When rebuilding my 260, I reached the conclusion that pretty much ALL of the aftermarket heads are sized for the bore size & displacement of the 302 and are really not suitable for a 260. The stock T; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00042.html (7,710 bytes)
2. RE: 260 cylinder heads (score: 1): Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>; Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 22:41:45 -0800; You raise an interesting question regarding the similarity of the Tiger and HiPo heads. After looking into this in some detail, I actually don't think that the stock Tiger 260 heads are comparable t; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00092.html (9,754 bytes)
3. RE: 260 cylinder heads (score: 1): Author: bmelusky@netscape.net; Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 20:32:22 -0500; The 302 4V (68) heads are a good choice for those that want to stay with an iron head. The combustion chamber is 1 cc smaller than the 260 head and the valves are bigger(1.78/1.45). They come in 2 fl; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00099.html (8,080 bytes)
4. 260 cylinder heads (score: 1): Author: "Doug & Rett Leithauser" <dleit@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 08:28:28 -0500; I had hoped to access Bob Mannel's Mustang and Small Block Ford V8 book, but I have not been able to beg, borrow or steal a copy. I did not resort to buying one. If you are correct, and Tom Monroe's; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00166.html (9,108 bytes)
5. RE: 260 cylinder heads (score: 1): Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>; Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 12:11:52 -0800; Thanks for your very interesting and informative response. I have now compared Mannel's and Monroe's casting number application information and, other than some omission's, Monroe's data agrees with; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00167.html (9,647 bytes)
6. RE: 260 cylinder heads (score: 1): Author: "Brian and Maribeth Moss" <BLMoss@Prodigy.net>; Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 19:29:46 -0500; Mystery solved? Don't know much about his reputation as an author, but George Reid, in "High Performance Ford Engine Parts Interchange" refers to the C4OE-B castings as improved 260 heads introduced; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00169.html (10,713 bytes)
7. RE: 260 cylinder heads (score: 1): Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>; Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 18:39:44 -0800; Thanks for the reference information. However, I don't see that this information really provides us with anything new that helps resolve the discrepancy. In fact, the following link also parrots Mon; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00170.html (9,878 bytes)
8. RE: 260 cylinder heads (score: 1): Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>; Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 19:09:30 -0800; Mannel has a Website! http://www.fordsmallblock.com/ I checked his "corrections" page; lots of them, but nothing about a mistake on the '64 260 heads. Maybe he'll respond to an inquiry. There are cer; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00171.html (8,289 bytes)
9. Re: 260 cylinder heads (score: 1): Author: "Bruce McGuire" <b_mcguire@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 19:31:45 -0800; I have some early Tiger heads that are marked C40E Combustion chamber shape? 260 of course. Bruce -- Original Message -- From: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu> To: "Brian and Maribeth Moss" <BLMoss@Pr; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00172.html (11,022 bytes)
10. RE: 260 cylinder heads (score: 1): Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>; Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 21:58:57 -0800; Thanks for the corroborating info. To an you also confirm that these heads are "A" castings? Bob Palmer rpalmer@ucsd.edu robertpalmer@paulhastings.com rpalmerbob@adelphia.net I have some early Tiger; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00173.html (8,660 bytes)
11. RE: 260 cylinder heads (score: 1): Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>; Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 19:08:48 -0800; I just received a nice reply to my inquiry from Bob Mannel. Bottom line, he says that Monroe's casting number is wrong in this case and others. I have asked his permission to post his reply to the L; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00174.html (8,448 bytes)
12. RE: 260 cylinder heads (score: 1): Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>; Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 20:44:32 -0800; Here is Bob Mannel's response to my inquiry about the possible existence of a variant C4OE-B head, i.e., not the HiPo head, and with no "289" marking. Bob Palmer rpalmer@ucsd.edu robertpalmer@paulha; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00181.html (9,955 bytes)
13. RE: 260 cylinder heads (score: 1): Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>; Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 20:44:34 -0800; Here is a follow-up response from Mannel. Bob Palmer rpalmer@ucsd.edu robertpalmer@paulhastings.com rpalmerbob@adelphia.net Bob, Sure, it is okay to post. Yes, I would like to hear the results. Tiger; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00182.html (9,315 bytes)
14. Re: 260 cylinder heads (score: 1): Author: "Doug & Rett Leithauser" <dleit@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 10:19:00 -0500; I had no idea what a controversy I was getting into when I started this. The heads on my car do not have screw in studs, and as previously mentioned, have the smaller 1.67" intake valves. I am not s; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00227.html (11,827 bytes)
15. Re: 260 cylinder heads (score: 1): Author: "Tom Brandt" <tbrandt@cox-internet.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 15:36:22 -0600; I have the original heads off of B9470099 on the shelf. They have the rounded, small combustion chambers and the 1.67 intake and 1.45 exhaust valves. The casting code is C4OE A and nowhere can I fin; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00231.html (8,600 bytes)
16. Re: 260 cylinder heads (score: 1): Author: "JRP" <JimParent@attbi.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 15:37:14 -0800; The information that I have (from the same book you quote; page 29) indicates that all 260's and all 289's up until 1968 had cylinder head combustion chamber volumes that were 55cc max and 52cc min.; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00236.html (9,445 bytes)
17. RE: 260 cylinder heads (score: 1): Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 18:08:34 -0800; All of Tom's information for the 260 and 289 heads jibes with Mannel. Also, according to Mannel, all 221 and early 260 heads had 1.59" intake and 1.39" exhaust valves with 0.310" stem diameters. In; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00244.html (8,496 bytes)
18. RE: 260 cylinder heads (score: 1): Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>; Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 09:47:11 -0800; I hope you aren't completely regretting having brought this subject up. It has been, for me, an interesting excursion and maybe helpful insofar as bringing attention to some largely overlooked infor; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00252.html (9,976 bytes)
19. Re: 260 cylinder heads (score: 1): Author: "Kathy and Erich Coiner" <kathy.coiner@gte.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 13:55:20 -0800; I recently changed the heads on my Tiger. It is a late Mk1A. The heads that came off are lying on the floor of my shop. The casting number is C4OE . Thats it. No -A or -B. I assume these are "-A" rev; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00255.html (11,110 bytes)
20. FW: 260 cylinder heads (score: 1): Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>; Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 22:40:14 -0800; Thanks ever so much for taking the trouble to check this point of contention out. I think your analysis is spot on; so, everyone take a pencil and cross out "B" and write in "A" on page 28 of Monroe; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00262.html (8,364 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]