Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*260\s+vs\s+289\s+in\s+the\s+LeMans\s+cars\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*260\s+vs\s+289\s+in\s+the\s+LeMans\s+cars\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. RE: 260 vs 289 in the LeMans cars (score: 1): Author: Stephen Waybright <gswaybright@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 08:41:53 -0700 (PDT); There are a number of good business explanations as to why the production Tiger launched w/ the 260. I think the more pressing question to answer (and what I think started this thread) is why Shelby; /html/tigers/2004-08/msg00197.html (7,054 bytes)
2. RE: 260 vs 289 in the LeMans cars (score: 1): Author: gharlowe@comcast.net; Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 17:59:37 +0000; Great discussion! I have often wondered what decisions were made over those crucial months in1962-1963 that caused the Cobra to start down the path to its icon status with a production run of just 1,; /html/tigers/2004-08/msg00199.html (7,123 bytes)
3. RE: 260 vs 289 in the LeMans cars (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.biz>; Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:43:35 -0400; Actually Shelby started with the 221 cu in engine that was sent to England to get the Cobra rolling. Shelby the snake charmer that he is, needed to show a product. The 221 was quickly change to a 260; /html/tigers/2004-08/msg00200.html (8,487 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]