Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*289\s+Harmonic\s+Balancer\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*289\s+Harmonic\s+Balancer\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. 289 Harmonic Balancer (score: 1): Author: "Dr. T. Y. McDowell" <tym@mediaone.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 07:47:20 -0500; I need a harmonic balancer from a 289. Does anyone have one they're willing to part with? Thanks in advance. Tym McDowell; /html/tigers/1999-07/msg00316.html (6,742 bytes)
2. Re: 289 Harmonic Balancer (score: 1): Author: MWood24020@aol.com; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 15:31:32 EDT; << I need a harmonic balancer from a 289. Does anyone have one they're willing to part with? >> TymLast I checked (about 3-4 years ago!), the 289 hi-po dampeners were still available. Mike; /html/tigers/1999-07/msg00325.html (6,850 bytes)
3. Re: 289 Harmonic Balancer (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <laifman@flash.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 15:22:47 -0700; Mike, Unsure that he wanted the Hi Po version, from his e-mail. There are differences, even in a stock balancer, amongst the weight balance. I believe that 3 bolt versions were 28 oz and 4 bolt versi; /html/tigers/1999-07/msg00329.html (8,038 bytes)
4. Re: 289 Harmonic Balancer (score: 1): Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 17:06:03 -0700; Steve, Tym, et Listers, Oh boy, let's get technical!! It looks like we've got two issues going here, balancing and vibration damping, that are getting a bit mixed up. The Ford Windsor and many other; /html/tigers/1999-07/msg00331.html (11,712 bytes)
5. Re: 289 Harmonic Balancer (score: 1): Author: Alpdavegre@aol.com; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 23:34:05 EDT; In response to your inquiry on a harmonic balancer. If your old balancer is okay except for the rubber you might want to try having it revulcanized. I had my Mk 1 260 dampner done by Dampner Dudes,; /html/tigers/1999-07/msg00336.html (7,293 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]