- 1. Re: 289 Hi-Po Crankshaft Identification (score: 1)
- Author: Dick Barker <dickbarker@earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 19:18:48 -0800
- -- Ron, OK, I guess I got it backwards, so disregard my last. If you are right about the cracks and flaws, then apparently all those Hi-Po's I put together years ago had bad cranks. One is in 7734KV,
- /html/tigers/2004-03/msg00023.html (7,533 bytes)
- 2. RE: 289 Hi-Po Crankshaft Identification (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>
- Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 21:07:19 -0800
- It seems this topic has already been extensively debated on the HiPo Mustang List. One noteworthy thing I found out was that Bob Mannel has interviewed an ex-Ford employee that claims to have been a
- /html/tigers/2004-03/msg00025.html (9,130 bytes)
- 3. Re: 289 Hi-Po Crankshaft Identification (score: 1)
- Author: Theo Smit <tsmit@shaw.ca>
- Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 22:36:09 -0700
- It's been about ten years for me, but from personal experience I can tell you that cracked cranks do indeed sound dull when struck, and a friend of mine had his (Datsun four-cylinder) crank heat-trea
- /html/tigers/2004-03/msg00026.html (7,893 bytes)
- 4. Re: 289 Hi-Po Crankshaft Identification (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Melusky <bmelusky@netscape.net>
- Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 05:49:19 -0500
- I was not at this foundry in the 60's but have been on a few melt decks before and supplied the metallurgical equipment to count nodules. Ductile, or nodular iron is made by "inoculation" of the met
- /html/tigers/2004-03/msg00028.html (9,064 bytes)
- 5. Re: 289 Hi-Po Crankshaft Identification (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Melusky <bmelusky@netscape.net>
- Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 05:21:46 -0500
- Maybe they had bad standards for their spectrometer! Foundries have buckets of material on the melt deck. Manganese, nickel, etc. depending upon what they are doing. They pull a sample out of the lad
- /html/tigers/2004-03/msg00046.html (8,360 bytes)
- 6. Re: 289 Hi-Po Crankshaft Identification (score: 1)
- Author: Drmoonstone@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 18:15:17 EST
- Sounds exciting. I've been looking through some of the publications I have and there is a mention of the Mexican produced block having a higher nickel content and that these blocks are somewhat desir
- /html/tigers/2004-03/msg00049.html (7,321 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu