Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*289\s+VS\s+260\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. 289 VS 260 (score: 1)
Author: rootes@ix.netcom.com
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 1997 23:25:10 -0800
Hello Everyone: A couple of issues that the discussion on engines is missing: I speak with a bit of knowledge having been in the retail (new car dealer) business for 13 years and having worked for tw
/html/tigers/1997-01/msg00069.html (8,499 bytes)

2. RE:289 VS 260 (score: 1)
Author: "Kempinski, Robert M." <RKEMPINS@SSF4.jsc.nasa.gov>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 10:12:00 -0600
-- REPLY FROM: Kempinski, Robert M. This engine discussion sounds like so much fun, I have to join in. Steve Sage makes two fine points. I agree wholeheartedly with them. First, the point about using
/html/tigers/1997-01/msg00071.html (9,932 bytes)

3. Re: 289 VS 260 (score: 1)
Author: HW200@aol.com
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 13:33:15 -0500 (EST)
To say that any auto manufacturer is not concerened with liability issues is very simply incorrect. It was an issue in the late 60's (does anyone remember the name Ralph Nader?), just as it was in th
/html/tigers/1997-01/msg00076.html (7,626 bytes)

4. Re: 289 VS 260 (score: 1)
Author: "Cliff Lipman, AMS" <72603.1327@CompuServe.COM>
Date: 10 Jan 97 17:40:20 EST
Wow. Such a popular thread. I couldn't stand to be left out of the crowd... Let's see.... I know I'm building one hell of a fast car..... I'm out of engines..... Why not use a bigger one which will g
/html/tigers/1997-01/msg00091.html (6,673 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu