Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*289\s+vs\.\s+302\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*289\s+vs\.\s+302\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. 289 vs. 302 (score: 1): Author: Dave Binkley <dbinkley@argotech.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 16:24:38 -0700; Once you get past the 5-bolt vs 6-bolt bellhousing issues and are clearly on the path to the 6-bolt route, what are the pro's and con's of going with a 289 versus a 302? I'm asking more from the poin; /html/tigers/1998-09/msg00371.html (6,603 bytes)
2. Re: 289 vs. 302 (score: 1): Author: TigerCoupe@aol.com; Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 19:31:19 EDT; them, or a 260 for that matter. They all fit and look the same. Period. Look. Dick Barker; /html/tigers/1998-09/msg00372.html (6,707 bytes)
3. Re: 289 vs. 302 (score: 1): Author: MWood24020@aol.com; Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 22:01:58 EDT; << what are the pro's and con's of going with a 289 versus a 302? I'm asking more from the point of view of fitting things up and period look. I agree with Dick's comments: Unless you want to spend a; /html/tigers/1998-09/msg00374.html (7,280 bytes)
4. Re: 289 vs. 302 (score: 1): Author: RSpontelli@aol.com; Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1998 00:03:43 EDT; << >From my point of view, there isn't a nickel's worth of difference between them, or a 260 for that matter. They all fit and look the same. Period. Look. >> And let's not foget the legendary 221. I; /html/tigers/1998-09/msg00378.html (6,740 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]