Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*3\.9\s+piston\s+options\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*3\.9\s+piston\s+options\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: 3.9 piston options? (score: 1): Author: "Carl Floyd" <cmfloyd@chartertn.net>; Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 11:07:11 -0400; I have spent waaay tooo many hours looking thru piston catalogs trying to find an alternative for those truck slugs. I believe I actually hit on something. Since the compression height seems to be t; /html/mgb-v8/2005-05/msg00002.html (8,432 bytes)
2. 3.9 piston options? (score: 1): Author: kmwheeler@ualr.edu; Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:42:51 -0500; Hey all, Currently taking a 3.9 0.020 over. I'm interested in opinions and experiences of high compression pistons for this -- at least higher compression than the wimpy Range Rover pistons! Thanks,; /html/mgb-v8/2005-04/msg00041.html (6,964 bytes)
3. Re: 3.9 piston options? (score: 1): Author: "Carl Floyd" <cmfloyd@chartertn.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 10:46:41 -0400; I'm in the same boat looking for good piston options for this engine. Seems that there is not many. Option 1: Order 9.35:1 cast Rover truck pistons from England. Use steel shim head gasket. Option 2; /html/mgb-v8/2005-04/msg00045.html (8,282 bytes)
4. Re: 3.9 piston options? (score: 1): Author: Glenn <g_wakefield@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 08:44:58 -0700 (PDT); I'm sure everyone knows this already, but when I purchased my 3.9 +20 pistons a few years ago, I purchased them from RPI in the UK. Shipping was quick, and at the time, they seemed to have the best s; /html/mgb-v8/2005-04/msg00046.html (8,793 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]