Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*3\.9\s+rear\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*3\.9\s+rear\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: 3.9 rear (score: 1): Author: Bill L <pythias@pacifier.com>; Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 16:26:24 -0700; Thanx to all who replied offering 3.9 rear ends for my trip to Mo.... interestingly enough, after running some numbers i'm not sure the conversion makes economic sense... the going rate (as defined; /html/spridgets/2007-05/msg00517.html (7,069 bytes)
2. Re: 3.9 rear (score: 1): Author: "Walt & Zoe Harrison" <wzharrison@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 21:36:18 -0700; Here's my two-cents ... the 3.9:1 ratio rear end is quite nice with a Sprite 1275cc engine and 4-speed web-case tranny. We've had one for years. It bolts right up to your existing rear-end and drive; /html/spridgets/2007-05/msg00526.html (8,930 bytes)
3. Re: 3.9 rear (score: 1): Author: "Robert E. Shlafer" <pilotrob@webtv.net>; Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 07:07:28 GMT; Fuel economy aside, Walt.... ........the higher ratio diffs are useful depending upon the kind of driving you are going to do. For those doing a majority of limited access driving, a 3.9 or better ye; /html/spridgets/2007-05/msg00531.html (7,439 bytes)
4. Re: 3.9 rear (score: 1): Author: Mike/Donna Carpenter <mail4carpenters@peoplepc.com>; Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 07:41:21 -0400 (EDT); There is really not enough of a difference between the 4.2 and the 3.9 differentials to warrant swapping out. Spridgets are so great on gas anyway, I doubt that you would even notice a monetary savin; /html/spridgets/2007-05/msg00536.html (10,218 bytes)
5. Re[2]: 3.9 rear (score: 1): Author: Bill L <pythias@pacifier.com>; Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 05:50:45 -0700; Hello Jack, the 4.22's come in the cars as stock.. when someone swaps out to a 3.9.. (as i might be about to).. well there ya go.. the 4.55's come from morris minors. -- Best regards, Bill mailto:pyt; /html/spridgets/2007-05/msg00537.html (7,115 bytes)
6. Re: 3.9 rear (score: 1): Author: James F Juhas <james.f.juhas@snet.net>; Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 16:57:23 -0400; 2 cents more. When faced with an axle replacement task, I installed a 3.9 in our 1966 Sprite with a 1098. It made a very nice difference. It became much more enjoyable to drive, more opportunity to r; /html/spridgets/2007-05/msg00565.html (8,648 bytes)
7. Re: 3.9 rear (score: 1): Author: Frank Clarici <spritenut@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 21:18:32 -0400; The 3.9 started sometime in the later 1/2 of 1969. -- Frank Clarici Toms River, NJ; /html/spridgets/2007-05/msg00576.html (7,555 bytes)
8. Re: 3.9 rear (score: 1): Author: "David Lieb" <dbl@chicagolandmgclub.com>; Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 20:46:52 -0500; Horler claims 12/1968; /html/spridgets/2007-05/msg00579.html (7,295 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]