- 1. 3 way Vs 2 (score: 1)
- Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 07:05:11 -0600
- Okay ... some of you have mentioned the 3 pass method.... I agree it was Harder on equipment... no question about it... but when was this Policy established.... I just re-read my Healey reports from
- /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg01589.html (7,431 bytes)
- 2. Re: 3 way Vs 2 (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 08:14:00 -0800
- In my discussion of the way records are set, I was not suggesting that we go back to the three pass deal because the two pass record is not sufficient. I don't know when this three pass requirement
- /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg01600.html (8,809 bytes)
- 3. Re: 3 way Vs 2 (score: 1)
- Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 12:22:58 -0600
- Tom I understood that... but thanks for Clarifying it... For the Most Part all of us look on the History of the sport and have great respect for the Early records.... sure don't mean we want to go ba
- /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg01603.html (11,033 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu