Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*300\s+heads\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*300\s+heads\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. 300 heads (score: 1): Author: "jon" <jonaxt@pacifier.com> (by way of David Kernberger); Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 17:42:41 -0800; Hello all, I haven'seen any reponse to this query from Jon Axt (below). I too would be interested in hearing anything anybody might have to say. In all discussions I have seen, the issue isn't addre; /html/buick-rover-v8/2002-04/msg00001.html (7,318 bytes)
2. Re: 300 heads (score: 1): Author: Curtis Hunter <amy_curt@pacbell.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 21:05:05 -0700; The 300 heads will fit the 215, 3.5 to 4.6L Rover. The main difference between the 215 and 300 Buick engines are the height and width of the block. The 300 is about 1" taller on the same degree "V"..; /html/buick-rover-v8/2002-04/msg00005.html (8,723 bytes)
3. Re: 300 heads (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 18:31:00 -0700; Curtis, Thanks for the response but it does not address the question that Jon and I have asked. That question is how to get the 215 valley cover/manifold gasket to match the intake ports on the 300; /html/buick-rover-v8/2002-04/msg00008.html (8,795 bytes)
4. Re: 300 heads (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 20:59:03 -0700; Curtis et al, The question still is whether there is a misalignment of the intake manifold/valley cover gasket that is not mentioned in any of the articles, including the March, 1985 Hot Rod Magazin; /html/buick-rover-v8/2002-04/msg00013.html (10,503 bytes)
5. Re: 300 heads (score: 1): Author: "jon" <jonaxt@pacifier.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 09:09:21 -0700; I want to put out what I see. I placed the tin valley cover against a 300 head. The 300 inlet ports are bigger, but not in a symmetric manner. The are enlarged by pushing their geometric centers outw; /html/buick-rover-v8/2002-04/msg00017.html (7,899 bytes)
6. 300 heads (score: 1): Author: "jon" <jonaxt@pacifier.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 09:27:58 -0800; Did the 300 engine still use the tin valley cover? Jon /// /// buick-rover-v8@autox.team.net mailing list ///; /html/buick-rover-v8/2002-03/msg00023.html (6,444 bytes)
7. Re: 300 heads (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 17:41:53 -0800; If memory serves me correctly, no. I think the intake manifold itself seals up the valley area. Dave K. -- /// /// buick-rover-v8@autox.team.net mailing list ///; /html/buick-rover-v8/2002-03/msg00024.html (6,542 bytes)
8. 300 heads (score: 1): Author: "jon" <jonaxt@pacifier.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 08:13:38 -0800; So, how does one fit 300 heads to a 215 or Rover block? I placed the 215 tin cover against a 300 head and the inlet ports don't quite line up. If you trim the tin cover you'll remove part of the seal; /html/buick-rover-v8/2002-03/msg00028.html (6,588 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]