Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*300\s+miles\s+70\s+mph\s+30\s+mpg\s+\:\)\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*300\s+miles\s+70\s+mph\s+30\s+mpg\s+\:\)\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. Re: 300 miles 70 mph 30 mpg :) (score: 1): Author: "REICHLE, CHRISTOPHER" <CREICHLE@nsc.msmail.miami.edu>; Date: Tue, 02 Jan 1996 14:20:00 -0800 (PST); This is a web page that has info on octane boosters and how to make your own cheap. give it a try. http://triumph.cs.utah.edu/sol/tech/octane_b.html I'll second that! Goldie, my '69 B, gets fine mile; /html/mgs/1996-01/msg00018.html (8,130 bytes)
2. Re: 300 miles 70 mph 30 mpg :) (score: 1): Author: jtilton@vt.edu (Jay Tilton); Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 10:28:04 +0500; My personal record in my 77 B (no name) was a little more than five gallons over 200 miles at a consistent 70 mph--an astounding ~40 mpg. And the car (no name) doesn't even have overdrive. Meanwhile,; /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00398.html (8,567 bytes)
3. Re: 300 miles 70 mph 30 mpg :) (score: 1): Author: jurrasm@genesis.torrington.com (Mark Jurras); Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 11:15:29 -0500; Or so you thought. This morning the daily lab discussion was about overdrive equiped cars. The question is: if you drive a car at 45 MPH in 4th no O/D and calculate the Mileage then drive the same c; /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00401.html (8,033 bytes)
4. Re: 300 miles 70 mph 30 mpg :) (score: 1): Author: russ@scubed.com (Russ Wilson); Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 09:23:44 -0800; Mark Jurras asked: The only real advantage of overdrive (to the car - it might offer some additional advantage to your ears) is that it reduces engine wear. Fuel comsumption is not the issue. Consump; /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00404.html (9,420 bytes)
5. Re: 300 miles 70 mph 30 mpg :) (score: 1): Author: "U. Goettsch" <ulix@u.washington.edu>; Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 09:33:18 -0800 (PST); Every engine has a rpm range where it is most efficient. I don't know what that range is on a B engine, and I don't know the rpm that 45mph would correspond to. Especially if your test track involves; /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00405.html (9,045 bytes)
6. Re: 300 miles 70 mph 30 mpg :) (score: 1): Author: "U. Goettsch" <ulix@u.washington.edu>; Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 09:37:52 -0800 (PST); Indeed he did ! Disregard my post then!! Sorry, Ulix "I need new glasses" __/__,__ ________/____,,_______ ................... (_o____o_) ..... (___ O _________ O ___/ .............. sprite caddy; /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00406.html (8,368 bytes)
7. Re: 300 miles 70 mph 30 mpg :) (score: 1): Author: "Ramm, Andy" <ARAMM@sv.tbgi.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 8:45:01 -0600; Emma ('69 B, now we're putting the name before the car) Got a steady 30 MPG on the trip back from Houston. Andy Ramm '67 Midget Mk III -- The Smidgin '69 B -- Emma --Original Message Follows-- My per; /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00407.html (8,861 bytes)
8. Re: 300 miles 70 mph 30 mpg :) (score: 1): Author: "W. R. Gibbons" <gibbons@northpole.med.uvm.edu>; Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 13:15:28 -0500 (EST); The most important variable would be air resistance. You would use less gas per mile at the lower car speed, because the energy needed to overcome air resistance would be substantially less. Ray Gibb; /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00409.html (8,747 bytes)
9. Re: 300 miles 70 mph 30 mpg :) (score: 1): Author: BLECKSTEIN@SHELL.MONMOUTH.COM; Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 15:29:34 -0500; higher altitude (thin air) get better mileage. Mike Leckstein(looking out the window at our end of fall blizzard.); /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00413.html (9,185 bytes)
10. Re: 300 miles 70 mph 30 mpg :) (score: 1): Author: "Ramm, Andy" <ARAMM@sv.tbgi.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 10:40:36 -0600; Not to cast a disparaging shadow on this discussion, but if you're concerned about aerodynamics, or gas mileage, go buy a Miata. If you want a car with character, one that delivers the true visceral; /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00414.html (8,780 bytes)
11. Re: 300 miles 70 mph 30 mpg :) (score: 1): Author: Peter Rebbechi <prebbech@ozemail.com.au>; Date: Thu, 21 Dec 1995 07:44:40 +1100 (EST); reading this post re miles/gallon seems unusual to me. I currently own an 88 XJ40, and am in the process of finding a new owner for this car, SO I CAN BUY AN MG!. When I first bought the jag, I got l; /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00415.html (9,617 bytes)
12. Re: 300 miles 70 mph 30 mpg :) (score: 1): Author: Dirk de Boer <deboer@duke.usask.ca>; Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 14:46:30 -0800 (PST); At high altitudes your mileage may drop because of the decrease in wind resistance in the lower density air, but what is the effect of the lower concentration of oxygen (say in g/l or in g/cubic ft); /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00416.html (8,931 bytes)
13. Re: 300 miles 70 mph 30 mpg :) (score: 1): Author: BLECKSTEIN@SHELL.MONMOUTH.COM; Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 18:33:00 -0500; at Mike; /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00421.html (9,172 bytes)
14. Re: 300 miles 70 mph 30 mpg :) (score: 1): Author: "Ramm, Andy" <ARAMM@sv.tbgi.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 16:24:53 -0600; For you motorcycle freaks, the following portions of Kevin Cameron's February 1995 TDC column in Cycle World may be familiar. It is by far the best explaination of air/fuel ratios and jetting I've ev; /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00426.html (13,817 bytes)
15. Re: 300 miles 70 mph 30 mpg :) (score: 1): Author: Felix Wong <felixksw@elaine41.Stanford.EDU>; Date: Thu, 21 Dec 1995 20:02:04 -0800 (PST); I'll second that! Goldie, my '69 B, gets fine mileage (up to 30mpg), but gosh, she sips only the finest and most expensive fuel. In fact, my original '69 owner's manual says, "due to the high-compres; /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00474.html (9,562 bytes)
16. Re: 300 miles 70 mph 30 mpg :) (score: 1): Author: Glenn Schnittke <glenns@edge.ercnet.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Dec 1995 01:30:59 -0600; I know it's a little late, but here's my list: 1. A maroon '73 BGT for Jeanette. 2. A house attached with a kitchen the size of Manitoba and a yard big enough for Violet (our cocker who loves riding; /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00475.html (8,474 bytes)
17. Re: 300 miles 70 mph 30 mpg :) (score: 1): Author: simon.matthews@st.com; Date: Fri, 22 Dec 95 09:44:58 +0100; When I worked for the POD at their research centre in Solihull (late 70's), there was a group working on CVTs (Continuously Variable Transmissions). What I understood was that, in order to get maxim; /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00476.html (9,186 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]