Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*351\s+W\s+head\s+application\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*351\s+W\s+head\s+application\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. 351 W head application (score: 1): Author: "Tom Witt" <wittsend@jps.net>; Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 12:35:06 -0800; I have been "scoping" out the Tiger-Ford related sites (T.U., D. Williams site etc.) for info on adapting the 351W heads to a 289. Though I have found a bunch of information it has more presented thi; /html/tigers/2002-04/msg00043.html (8,477 bytes)
2. RE: 351 W head application (score: 1): Author: "Palmer, Robert L." <RPalmer@brobeck.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 12:55:54 -0800; I found this info on the "K" heads from the Small Block Musings discussion group: "Now for real thrills, take the 351 Windsor, which came out in 1968. Ford made them until 1978 or so, then replaced; /html/tigers/2002-04/msg00044.html (9,466 bytes)
3. Re: 351 W head application (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@SoCal.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 13:32:39 -0800; Quite a shopping list of 351 questions. Have you read Monroe's "how-to..." book on the differences? This is an invaluable reference, and even tells you the compression ratio with each different head; /html/tigers/2002-04/msg00045.html (8,768 bytes)
4. Re: 351 W head application (score: 1): Author: twojohnsons@cox.net; Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2002 08:57:27 -0500; Back in the leaded days--when even Laifman was young--I always used unleaded 93 octane premium as did all the gearheads except those who had ultra high compression (they used Sunoco 260) I never had; /html/tigers/2002-04/msg00046.html (9,509 bytes)
5. Re: 351 W head application (score: 1): Author: "Tom Witt" <wittsend@jps.net>; Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2002 10:25:00 -0800; Thanks for your reply. I agree about the foot dragging. I am not even at the engine part yet (but like to plan for the future) and I have heard what you say. I also read though (I think it was it th; /html/tigers/2002-04/msg00050.html (11,048 bytes)
6. Re: 351 W head application (score: 1): Author: "Chris Hill" <Pirouette@uisreno.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 02:49:09 -0800; If you're looking to pick jewelry off automotive corpses, watch out for imitations. I have a set of '69 or '70 351 heads, and those are supposed to be the best years. I can't remember why, but there; /html/tigers/2002-04/msg00051.html (8,888 bytes)
7. Re: 351 W head application (score: 1): Author: twojohnsons@cox.net; Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2002 09:30:00 -0400; They were the only 2 years w/high compression. Others were "smog" low compression heads. You can ID them easily by the cast-in parts numbers--C90E for the 1969, and D00E for the 1970, if memory serve; /html/tigers/2002-04/msg00052.html (9,381 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]