Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*4\.3\s+ltr\.\s+Triumph\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. 4.3 ltr. Triumph (score: 1)
Author: "T.R. Householder" <trhouse@greenapple.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 00:37:05 -0400
Friend wants some info on 4.3 ltr Chevy conversion including Adapterplate to TR 4 or 6 trans., or Nissan Trans. Any suggestions T.R.
/html/fot/2000-08/msg00335.html (7,281 bytes)

2. Re: 4.3 ltr. Triumph (score: 1)
Author: "R. John Lye" <rjl6n@server1.mail.virginia.edu>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 06:55:58 -0400
Is that the V-6? Bob Kamholtz put a V-6 into his TR-3; I don't know if its the 4.3 or not, though. Cheers, John Lye rjl6n@Virginia.edu
/html/fot/2000-08/msg00336.html (7,684 bytes)

3. Re: 4.3 ltr. Triumph (score: 1)
Author: N197TR4@cs.com
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 09:12:45 EDT
I think that was a Buick 3.8, but not entirely sure. << Bob Kamholtz put a V-6 into his TR-3; I don't know if its the 4.3 or not, though. Cheers, John Lye rjl6n@Virginia.edu
/html/fot/2000-08/msg00337.html (7,472 bytes)

4. RE: 4.3 ltr. Triumph (score: 1)
Author: Russ Moore <rem@CBORD.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 09:29:42 -0400
Overdose of cheese does strange things to a man! Even in Wisconson. Russ Moore --Original Message-- From: owner-fot@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-fot@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of N197TR4@cs.com Sent: F
/html/fot/2000-08/msg00338.html (7,986 bytes)

5. Re: 4.3 ltr. Triumph (score: 1)
Author: Bob Lang <LANG@isis.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 09:34:48 -0400 (EDT)
Not sure if anything actually exists, but check with John's Cars in the Dallas/Ft. Worth area. They offer a lot of conversions. I know they have a GM V6 conversion for TR7 - but I don't know for sure
/html/fot/2000-08/msg00339.html (8,481 bytes)

6. Re: 4.3 ltr. Triumph (score: 1)
Author: "Irv Korey" <emanteno@attglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 09:47:57 -0500
not, Bob did put a Chevy 4.3 into his TR3, and it was a warmed up version of that engine. As I remember, it required some pretty significant frame and mount modifications. The car was very fast. He s
/html/fot/2000-08/msg00340.html (8,111 bytes)

7. Re: 4.3 ltr. Triumph (score: 1)
Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 10:46:27 -0700
But on the other hand, the 4.3 V^ has (at least in my opinion) a pretty GOOD rep. I put 205,000 miles on a '90 S10 Blazer with this engine and it was still running strong when I got rid of it. So I r
/html/fot/2000-08/msg00342.html (9,893 bytes)

8. Re: 4.3 ltr. Triumph (score: 1)
Author: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 16:48:43 -0500
The popular conversion for more horsepower seems to be V6's or V8's. I wonder if anybody has tried a newer straight six - there are several around that have lots more hp than the Triumph, and it woul
/html/fot/2000-08/msg00343.html (8,815 bytes)

9. Re: 4.3 ltr. Triumph (score: 1)
Author: "fredd" <fal@hiwaay.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 18:33:03 -0700
What about a TR3A with a Ford 289cu ? There's one in Florence, AL. fredd not,
/html/fot/2000-08/msg00344.html (8,153 bytes)

10. 4.3 ltr. Triumph (score: 1)
Author: "fredd" <fal@hiwaay.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 18:54:27 -0700
While still living in Belgium (before 1990) I met a TR owner that had a Nissan 280Z engine in his TR6. Don't know that it was with or without the Nissan transmission. fredd
/html/fot/2000-08/msg00345.html (7,961 bytes)

11. Re: 4.3 ltr. Triumph (score: 1)
Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 17:49:43 -0700
The 4 Liter straight 6 in my wife's Jeep puts out lots of power, but It sure is Looooooong! I wonder if it would fit! Joe (C)
/html/fot/2000-08/msg00346.html (8,349 bytes)

12. RE: 4.3 ltr. Triumph (score: 1)
Author: "James F. Libecco" <jfl@neoucom.edu>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 21:26:05 -0400
by the weight of my jeep, the majority of which coming from the massive engine- putting out much less power than something that size ought to-a poor tr would be scraping through frame rails if 1000#
/html/fot/2000-08/msg00347.html (9,138 bytes)

13. Re: 4.3 ltr. Triumph (score: 1)
Author: Herald948@aol.com
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 21:22:11 EDT
sure Which, considering some of Triumph's postwar history, would truly bring things full circle. At various times there were discussions about such proposals as Standard-Triumph engines powering what
/html/fot/2000-08/msg00348.html (8,559 bytes)

14. Re: 4.3 ltr. Triumph (score: 1)
Author: WEmery7451@aol.com
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 22:38:48 EDT
<< At various times there were discussions about such proposals as Standard-Triumph engines powering what became the Metropolitan, I use to see the TR3/4 four cylinder tractor engines in these cars.
/html/fot/2000-08/msg00349.html (8,716 bytes)

15. Re: 4.3 ltr. Triumph (score: 1)
Author: WEmery7451@aol.com
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 22:47:21 EDT
<< The first car I owned was a Rambler American, which was identical to the 1950 Nash Rambler with the same engine, but without a frame. >> I forgot to mention the year of the Rambler American. It wa
/html/fot/2000-08/msg00350.html (7,574 bytes)

16. RE: 4.3 ltr. Triumph (score: 1)
Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 18:02:44 -0700
Actually, the Cheatin' Dog TR3 (yes, I'm appropriating the name) had a twin cam Toyota motor and trans in it for a long time. I still have the unit. While it was theoretically a 4 cylinder 1600 (base
/html/fot/2000-08/msg00352.html (8,467 bytes)

17. Re: 4.3 ltr. Triumph (score: 1)
Author: "Roger Beasley" <beeline@iline.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 13:50:59 -0400
I think Mary Ann Wakeman? has done a GM V6 to Land Rover conversion and has a lot of information on V6 conversions on her WEB site. I don't have either her e-mail address or her WEB site address on
/html/fot/2000-08/msg00353.html (8,235 bytes)

18. Re: 4.3 ltr. Triumph (score: 1)
Author: Bob Lang <LANG@isis.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 09:26:45 -0400 (EDT)
I have not made any measurements, but many of the newer in-line sixes, like the BMW 2.5 and larger units seem to be longer packages. You could make them fit, but welding and grinding if the body woul
/html/fot/2000-08/msg00369.html (8,997 bytes)

19. RE: 4.3 ltr. Triumph (score: 1)
Author: "Barr, Scott" <sbarr@mccarty-law.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 08:38:02 -0500
<< This, I believe is precisely why the V8's and V6's are so get a lot of ponies in a package that's pretty small. Less than two feet long, a little bigger than two feet wide and not too tall conside
/html/fot/2000-08/msg00370.html (10,440 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu