Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*4\s+cyl\s+vs\s+6\s+cyl\s+tach\s+issues\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*4\s+cyl\s+vs\s+6\s+cyl\s+tach\s+issues\.\.\.\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. 4 cyl vs 6 cyl tach issues... (score: 1): Author: montnaro@ausable.crd.ge.com (Skip Montanaro); Date: Wed, 25 May 94 09:18:39 EDT; I have swapped a 6 cylinder engine in place of the 4 in my Spitfire and the tach is (surprise!) off by a factor of 1.5. I think Phil might sent me some theory, but no actual devices were described. W; /html/british-cars/1994-05/msg00686.html (7,305 bytes)
2. Re: 4 cyl vs 6 cyl tach issues... (score: 1): Author: William Hartwell Woodruff <woodruff@engin.umich.edu>; Date: Wed, 25 May 1994 14:08:04 -0400; Unfortunately not. The GT6 had a mechanical tach which looks different than the other gauges in the spit. -- William Woodruff woodruff@caen.engin.umich.edu; /html/british-cars/1994-05/msg00713.html (7,192 bytes)
3. Re: 4 cyl vs 6 cyl tach issues... (score: 1): Author: Steve Methley <sgm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>; Date: Thu, 26 May 94 15:15:18 BST; /html/british-cars/1994-05/msg00752.html (7,634 bytes)
4. Re: 4 cyl vs 6 cyl tach issues... (score: 1): Author: phile@stpaul.gov (Philip J Ethier); Date: Thu, 26 May 1994 16:02:24 -0500 (CDT); William Hartwell Woodruff is apparently trying to change a Smiths tachometer from a 4 banger so it works accurately with a six. There is a way to get a much better tach without losing the original lo; /html/british-cars/1994-05/msg00776.html (7,783 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]