Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*56K\s+Line\s+Speed\s+\-\s+physics\s+not\s+Feds\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*56K\s+Line\s+Speed\s+\-\s+physics\s+not\s+Feds\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. 56K Line Speed - physics not Feds (score: 1): Author: MGBDude@aol.com; Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 11:22:19 EST; It is my understanding that copper lines top out at about 38K, the resistance in wire to conducting electrical current is what determines this (even the Feds can't regulate natural physics - no matte; /html/mgs/1999-02/msg00699.html (7,859 bytes)
2. Re: 56K Line Speed - physics not Feds (score: 1): Author: Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca>; Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 14:38:38 -0500; No, that's not true, the traces on your computer motherboard are copper and think of the frequencies they run at. The limit is simply because your virtual phone channel was made to carry voice. Wheth; /html/mgs/1999-02/msg00713.html (9,004 bytes)
3. Re: 56K Line Speed - physics not Feds (score: 1): Author: MGBDude@aol.com; Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 15:20:10 EST; Thanks Trevor, I had been operating under mistaken beliefs - and I appreciate your input and addition to my knowledge - actually I had wondered about the traces on the motherboard - but seeing as how; /html/mgs/1999-02/msg00716.html (7,250 bytes)
4. Re: 56K Line Speed - physics not Feds (score: 1): Author: "Kai Radicke" <mowogmg@pil.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 16:24:48 -0500; (adding to Trevor's already posted remarks) "Basically, the signaling levels of the modems are in all cases just princely. But as it turns out, it is possible to pass digital data at 64kbps rate bet; /html/mgs/1999-02/msg00721.html (8,961 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]