- 1. Re: 6 cylinder in a 100 chassis / Because (score: 1)
- Author: "62BT7" <62BT7@prodigy.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 15:03:45 -0700
- BECAUSE, the Healey was toooo beeeee, (Shelby's 1st choice) before DMH nixed it. Kirk Kvam :-) 59/60 100-6/3000 BN7 #405 (Nasty Boy V-8 302Ford) buzzz buzzz
- /html/healeys/2004-05/msg00367.html (7,356 bytes)
- 2. Re: 6 cylinder in a 100 chassis / Because (score: 1)
- Author: "David Masucci" <dmasucci@radiantsoundworks.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 20:38:20 -0400
- Hey Kirk...why did DMH not sign up for that? I thought I'd heard in that past that he always wanted to place a V8 into the car. I did not know anything about the Mercedes/Datsun connection either...I
- /html/healeys/2004-05/msg00371.html (7,096 bytes)
- 3. Re: 6 cylinder in a 100 chassis / Because (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob Spidell" <bspidell@pacbell.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 19:27:58 -0700
- Don't have my "Healey Story" copy with me, but I seem to recall it was BMC, not DMH who nixed the idea. bs ** Bob Spidell San Jose, CA bspidell@pacbell.net '67 Austin-Healey 3000 '56 Austin-Healey 10
- /html/healeys/2004-05/msg00377.html (7,836 bytes)
- 4. RE: 6 cylinder in a 100 chassis / Because (score: 1)
- Author: "i erbs" <eyera3@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 20:15:52 -0700
- BMC killed the Rolls V8 healey and the Healey for 1968 in favor of the 6cyl I ERbs Don't have my "Healey Story" copy with me, but I seem to recall it was BMC, not DMH who nixed the idea. bs ** Bob Sp
- /html/healeys/2004-05/msg00381.html (8,046 bytes)
- 5. RE: 6 cylinder in a 100 chassis / Because (score: 1)
- Author: "Alex" <alexmm@adelphia.net>
- Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 09:28:00 -0400
- Hi Bob: During a recent visit to Seattle I was intrigued by a 3000 sitting in the window of a downtown showroom. After settling into my hotel, I trotted over to take a look-see. Much to my astonishme
- /html/healeys/2004-05/msg00385.html (8,119 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu