Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*64\s+lb\.\s+engine\s+\-\s+non\-lbc\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*64\s+lb\.\s+engine\s+\-\s+non\-lbc\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: 64 lb. engine - non-lbc (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 03 Nov 1997 07:24:05 PST; Has anyone considered the obvious, that there is a punctuation error in the WSJ article? Could the engine weigh 64 lbs (10%) less than it's predecessor? Admittedly a 640 lb motor also sounds excessiv; /html/triumphs/1997-11/msg00133.html (6,792 bytes)
2. Re: 64 lb. engine - non-lbc (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 03 Nov 1997 08:17:53 -0800; Jim, I read a different connotation into the statement. The weight of 64 pounds would be 10% less than its predecessor only if its predecessor weighed about 71 lbs. 640 lb predecesor would indicate t; /html/triumphs/1997-11/msg00140.html (7,171 bytes)
3. 64 lb. engine - non-lbc (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 14:36:11 -0800; Chris - Page A10 of today's Wall Street Journal quotes - "Toyota acknowledges that the redesigned , 1.8 liter dual overhead cam engine in the new Corolla contains just 560 parts, nearly 25% fewer tha; /html/triumphs/1997-10/msg02663.html (7,091 bytes)
4. Re: 64 lb. engine - non-lbc (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 14:47:30 EST; WSJ p A10: The engine weighs 64 lbs. or about 10% less than its I'd say it's gotta be 164 lbs or 64 kilos -- 64lbs of aluminum just isn't enough.... probably some "composite" parts, too.... The crank; /html/triumphs/1997-10/msg02664.html (6,782 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]