Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*66\s+or\s+67\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*66\s+or\s+67\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. 66 or 67 (score: 1): Author: "Ohan ." <yvrcanada@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 10:55:23 -0700; Hi Guys, During the 1966 production year for Alpines. At What serial number were the cars considered '66 model year? and '67 model year? "Keep the 'beam alive" Ohan Korlikian Vancouver, BC '64 Series; /html/alpines/2005-06/msg00031.html (6,737 bytes)
2. Re: 66 or 67 (score: 1): Author: "Ohan ." <yvrcanada@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:25:35 -0700; Hi Chuck, Thanks but that's not what I need. If an Alpine was built in 66... At what point was it considered a 67.. You know how cars that are built the year previous are considered the current years; /html/alpines/2005-06/msg00032.html (10,859 bytes)
3. Re: 66 or 67 (score: 1): Author: humbersnipe <humbersnipe@cox.net>; Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 21:55:42 -0500; You see, that's where it gets tricky. Rootes did running changes on most of their cars, there's no real cutoff of "model year" as manufacturers do today. "Model year" of an older car will depend upon; /html/alpines/2005-06/msg00033.html (9,351 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]