Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*67\.5\s+1600\s+vs\s+2000\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*67\.5\s+1600\s+vs\s+2000\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. 67.5 1600 vs 2000 (score: 1): Author: Robert.Long@CSDInc.com; Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 13:54:08 -0700; I have a question about 67.5 models. Are the 1600's and the 2000's the same except for the engine & transmission? I've never seen a 67.5 2000 in person, so I really don't know the differences. Later; /html/datsun-roadsters/1999-12/msg00182.html (7,536 bytes)
2. RE: 67.5 1600 vs 2000 (score: 1): Author: Andrew Murphy <andrew.murphy@integtech.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 14:31:27 -0800; Hey Robert, The chassis is the same. The only "real" difference is that the speedometer goes to 160 and the tach to 8000 on the 2000. Of course the badges and grill are different, but they are cosmet; /html/datsun-roadsters/1999-12/msg00186.html (8,383 bytes)
3. RE: 67.5 1600 vs 2000 (score: 1): Author: "John F Sandhoff" <sandhoff@compctr.ccs.csus.edu>; Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 15:00:12 PST8PDT; Don't forget that rare trim ring around the rear license plate! -- John John F Sandhoff sandhoff@csus.edu Sacramento, CA; /html/datsun-roadsters/1999-12/msg00188.html (7,480 bytes)
4. Re: 67.5 1600 vs 2000 (score: 1): Author: Ron Hamilton <ej99176@goodnet.com>; Date: Wed, 08 Dec 1999 16:51:48 -0700; Add to that the shifter cover plate the licence plate surround the engine wiring harness AND the all important "R as in SRL Ron; /html/datsun-roadsters/1999-12/msg00190.html (8,835 bytes)
5. Re[2]: 67.5 1600 vs 2000 (score: 1): Author: Fred_Katz@ci.sf.ca.us; Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 16:08:44 -0800; And the shifter holes on the trans tunnel are spaced differently. Fred - So.SF (no snow, just iced windows) _________________________ Reply Separator _________________________; /html/datsun-roadsters/1999-12/msg00191.html (9,437 bytes)
6. Re: 67.5 1600 vs 2000 (score: 1): Author: XeddeX@aol.com; Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 19:33:13 EST; << the licence plate surround >> The licence plate is definitely a sought after item. I would love to have one for my 1600. I have been told that this is a rare part and people sell them for a premiu; /html/datsun-roadsters/1999-12/msg00192.html (8,145 bytes)
7. Re: 67.5 1600 vs 2000 (score: 1): Author: Alan Bent <ajb@squirrel.com.au>; Date: Thu, 09 Dec 1999 11:42:03 +1100; I think there is a slightly different support brace inside the transmission tunnel. Alan Bent , Queensland Australia.; /html/datsun-roadsters/1999-12/msg00195.html (7,937 bytes)
8. Re: 67.5 1600 vs 2000 (score: 1): Author: CalSpeed@aol.com; Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 22:59:55 EST; << Add to that the shifter cover plate the licence plate surround the engine wiring harness AND the all important "R as in SRL >> And the Grille! Oh, and the proud and snotty smile too. <Yeah right>; /html/datsun-roadsters/1999-12/msg00201.html (7,952 bytes)
9. Re: 67.5 1600 vs 2000 (score: 1): Author: Gordon Glasgow <glasgow@serv.net>; Date: Wed, 08 Dec 1999 20:43:33 -0800; The Almazans had some for sale at Shasta in '98. They weren't original, they had had them custom-made but they looked really good. -- Gordon Glasgow http://www.gordon-glasgow.org; /html/datsun-roadsters/1999-12/msg00204.html (8,653 bytes)
10. Re: 67.5 1600 vs 2000 (score: 1): Author: Gordon Glasgow <glasgow@serv.net>; Date: Wed, 08 Dec 1999 20:47:20 -0800; No, the 5-speed and 4-speed are different lengths. The hole in the tunnel is in a different location. -- Gordon Glasgow http://www.gordon-glasgow.org; /html/datsun-roadsters/1999-12/msg00205.html (8,155 bytes)
11. Fw: 67.5 1600 vs 2000 (score: 1): Author: "Gerardo Magana" <gmagana@softcom.net>; Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 22:07:51 -0800; I think that I bought the last one that Dave had this summer, If you want though I can call Dave for you and ask him if he has any more or plans to make some more as these were reproduction pieces. O; /html/datsun-roadsters/1999-12/msg00206.html (9,286 bytes)
12. Re: 67.5 1600 vs 2000 (score: 1): Author: STAN CHERNOFF <az589@lafn.org>; Date: Wed, 08 Dec 1999 22:18:44 -0800; All of the 67.5 cars had the same hole in the transmission tunnel since the shift boot and dust covers were attached to the shift plate. As long as the shift plate is the one for the trans the it wo; /html/datsun-roadsters/1999-12/msg00207.html (8,581 bytes)
13. Re: 67.5 1600 vs 2000 (score: 1): Author: "Fred Katz" <fredkatz@2xtreme.net>; Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 22:36:14 -0800; Hmmn,... I should've bought a '67.5, would have saved me some cutting time that I spent on my '66. Stan, I'll get that check out to you! Thanks, Fred -- <datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net> the speed tu; /html/datsun-roadsters/1999-12/msg00210.html (9,343 bytes)
14. Re: 67.5 1600 vs 2000 (score: 1): Author: Toby B <toby@wolfenet.com>; Date: Thu, 09 Dec 1999 11:48:27 -0800; They're unlike the later cars, which had different holes in the body... Toby; /html/datsun-roadsters/1999-12/msg00226.html (7,520 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]