Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*70\s+carbs\s+on\s+a\s+80\s+B\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*70\s+carbs\s+on\s+a\s+80\s+B\.\.\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. 70 carbs on a 80 B.. (score: 1): Author: "Taylor, Todd S" <todd.s.taylor@lmco.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 08:17:29 -0400; Has anybody ever installed 70 B carbs (dual SU's ) on a 80 B??? I'd like to try it. (get more power) If so, what do you need?? Carbs, manifold anything else that has to be changed???? Anybody have a; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg01137.html (7,561 bytes)
2. Re: 70 carbs on a 80 B.. (score: 1): Author: Barney Gaylord <barneymg@ntsource.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 09:01:41 -0500; Yes. Well actually it was a 76 B, but prretty much the same. Got the full tech session with 64 photos and notes right here: http://www.chicagolandmgclub.com/photos/carbswap_zs2su Complete carburetor; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg01139.html (8,755 bytes)
3. RE: 70 carbs on a 80 B.. (score: 1): Author: "smarc" <smarc@abs.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 15:00:49 -0400; One of the reasons I decided to go with a single Weber DGV on my 80 B was that I was informed that unless I was changing the camshaft as well, there wasn't much reason to have the dual carbs. I've si; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg01145.html (9,671 bytes)
4. Re: 70 carbs on a 80 B.. (score: 1): Author: Paul Root <proot@attbi.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 16:49:11 -0500; What's the big differences with the camshaft change? And the dizzy? Is it just to get away from the EI? Or are the advance curves drastically different? I'm running a pertronix on the stock ('77) diz; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg01152.html (10,769 bytes)
5. RE: 70 carbs on a 80 B.. (score: 1): Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 15:45:32 -0700; Executive summary: 1. The late camshaft is slightly advanced from the early. This means more low end torque, less top end power. Nothing wrong in that if you are running the car on the street. 2. The; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg01153.html (8,337 bytes)
6. RE: 70 carbs on a 80 B.. (score: 1): Author: "Marc" <smarc@abs.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 09:33:30 -0400; Kelvin Dodd wrote ... OK, that seems reasonable. If doing an engine rebuild, would it be best to use the the same camshaft, an early camshaft, or something completely different? As an aside, my '73 B; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg01171.html (10,743 bytes)
7. RE: 70 carbs on a 80 B.. (score: 1): Author: Chuck Renner <crenner@dynalivery.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:14:10 -0500; See these two pages for information on their operation: http://www.chicagolandmgclub.com/techtips/552.html http://www.chicagolandmgclub.com/techtips/542.html /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/m; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg01175.html (7,533 bytes)
8. RE: 70 carbs on a 80 B.. (score: 1): Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:45:27 -0700; The cam and tappets on a B engine are a weak point. Choice of cam is always going to be a tradeoff. More performance will entail higher wear. The stock grind is a balance between performance and wea; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg01182.html (12,725 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]