- 1. 72 BGT Carbs (score: 1)
- Author: SHolli1018@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 13:31:52 EST
- Oh Wise Ones, I have a 72 BGT. I'm about to begin a motor rebuild and want to have a fresh set of carbs to put on it when I get done. I have 2 sets of HIF4's in the car and the garage. I also have 2
- /html/mgs/2002-12/msg00327.html (7,124 bytes)
- 2. Re: 72 BGT Carbs (score: 1)
- Author: "Telewest \(PH\)" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 15:31:25 -0000
- All other things being equal I'd go for the HSs. Fewer bits and ports inside to go wrong or get blocked, you can get at the float chamber in-situ, you can confirm correct choke operation visibly, and
- /html/mgs/2002-12/msg00344.html (8,014 bytes)
- 3. Re: 72 BGT Carbs (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill & Penny" <wcameyer@msn.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 17:07:19 -0700
- I quite prefer the HS's for the ease of adjustment. I can actually SEE what I am doing, that I am actually turning something. Also, this adjustment is so muich easier to access. Bill /// or try http:
- /html/mgs/2002-12/msg00345.html (6,910 bytes)
- 4. Re: 72 BGT Carbs (score: 1)
- Author: David Councill <dcouncil@imt.net>
- Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 12:17:38 -0700
- So far it looks like two votes for the HS4s. Normally I would agree for the same reasons - the simplicity of the HS4s. I'm not very familiar with the HIF4s and I like the separate float bowls of the
- /html/mgs/2002-12/msg00347.html (8,588 bytes)
- 5. Re: 72 BGT Carbs (score: 1)
- Author: "Telewest \(PH\)" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:17:49 -0000
- Very different cars, but my V8 with HIFs needs every millimetre of choke to start in cold weather and for several seconds after that whereas the roadster with HSs needs neither, so O(ur)MDV. I had pu
- /html/mgs/2002-12/msg00358.html (7,521 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu