Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*72\s+Triumph\s+spitfire\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*72\s+Triumph\s+spitfire\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Fwd: 72 Triumph spitfire (score: 1): Author: BillDentin@aol.com; Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:52:30 EDT; Amici: Judy Cull (VSCDA) sent me the above. I (we) have no personal knowledge nor interest, but thought I would forward it in case some one on the list want to pursue this. Bill Dentinger Return-Path; /html/fot/2004-07/msg00167.html (8,931 bytes)
2. Re: 72 Triumph spitfire (score: 1): Author: Herald948@aol.com; Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:19:06 EDT; website. == The ONLY reason I can think of why it would HAVE to be a '72 engine is for the sake of originality. A '72 Spitfire engine is by far the LEAST powerful of all the "stock" 1300 or 1500 engi; /html/fot/2004-07/msg00168.html (7,741 bytes)
3. Re: 72 Triumph spitfire (score: 1): Author: "Aaron Johnson" <fpspitfire37@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:56:32 -0700; I did have an interesting talk with Bob Yarwood on the subject of the large journal 1296 vs. the small journal 1296. His opinion and my opinion are both that for a super reliable strong running motor; /html/fot/2004-07/msg00194.html (9,192 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]