Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*75\#oil\s+pressure\s+$was\s+zero$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*75\#oil\s+pressure\s+$was\s+zero$\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. 75#oil pressure (was zero) (score: 1): Author: "Bill Meyer" <wcameyer@email.msn.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 13:12:59 -0700; Yes, the missing plug was the problem and I now have about 40 miles on it and the pressure looks great. BUT 1. I put a 180 deg thermostat in it, but it pushes right up to 190 and with very little in-; /html/mgs/2002-01/msg00796.html (7,336 bytes)
2. Re: 75#oil pressure (was zero) (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 13:10:58 -0800; Must be the gauge or the sender, not the thermostat. A good gauge will be on the bottom peg at ambient temp (at least in winter). Possibly the gauge can be calibrated. I don't think you can just atta; /html/mgs/2002-01/msg00799.html (8,105 bytes)
3. Re: 75#oil pressure (was zero) (score: 1): Author: "Bill Meyer" <wcameyer@email.msn.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 16:56:12 -0700; The temp indicator and sender are the old capillary tube type, not electric. I should have mentioned that this late ('74) engine is in a '67 B. Thanks, Bill /// /// mgs@autox.team.net mailing list //; /html/mgs/2002-01/msg00804.html (6,913 bytes)
4. Re: 75#oil pressure (was zero) (score: 1): Author: Charles & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 08:11:57 -0600; Oh Shucks, You probably did, somewhere along the line. My mistake. Well, measuring the actual coolant temp is still a good idea, so you'll know what the normal temp really is as compared to the gauge; /html/mgs/2002-01/msg00816.html (7,352 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]