Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*948\s+Vs\.\s+1275\s+Rollers\s+Valve\s+Rockers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*948\s+Vs\.\s+1275\s+Rollers\s+Valve\s+Rockers\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. 948 Vs. 1275 Rollers Valve Rockers (score: 1): Author: derf <derf247@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 22:39:00 -0500; I saw some roller rockers on ebay. The seller claimed that they would work on 948 and 1098 A series engines but not on 1275s. Why? What is different about 948 Vs. 1275 rocker setups? Cheers, Derf; /html/spridgets/2006-08/msg00589.html (6,360 bytes)
2. Re: 948 Vs. 1275 Rollers Valve Rockers (score: 1): Author: Frank Clarici <spritenut@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 21:28:07 -0400; There is a slight difference but I didn't think it mattered. I know 1098 rockers work on a 1275. -- Frank Clarici Toms River, NJ; /html/spridgets/2006-08/msg00628.html (6,911 bytes)
3. Re: 948 Vs. 1275 Rollers Valve Rockers (score: 1): Author: John Caffrey <jdc6@lehigh.edu>; Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 07:57:35 -0400; These roller rockers just may fit a 1275 head. I could not get them lined up perfectly on the valve centerlines, but I had forgotten that the trial assembly was done on an aluminum head, which has th; /html/spridgets/2006-08/msg00633.html (7,202 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]