Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*94hp\,\s+1800cc\s+vs\s+1622cc\s+engine$longish$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*94hp\,\s+1800cc\s+vs\s+1622cc\s+engine$longish$\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: 94hp, 1800cc vs 1622cc engine(longish) (score: 1): Author: Howard gentry <zymmer4@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 07:18:21 -0700 (PDT); I have been following this thread with some interest. Why? Because I am wondering if the B engine is as easily tuned to some higher HP than the A engine. I was on the SCCA club team in Charleston,Wv; /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00911.html (8,815 bytes)
2. Re: 94hp, 1800cc vs 1622cc engine(longish) (score: 1): Author: Eric <eric@erickson.on.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 00:29:00 +0930; My first question was going to be "and how much does an Elva weigh"? My friend has a 4 cylinder 'B racecar that goes considerably faster than my car at the same track. The differences being that it h; /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00915.html (9,003 bytes)
3. Re: 94hp, 1800cc vs 1622cc engine(longish) (score: 1): Author: Howard gentry <zymmer4@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 08:01:59 -0700 (PDT); Eric, The Elva was a feather weight..But those pesky porsches were the very devil to beat. The 3 main bering engine was the picture of reliability, if balanced. Wish I had that Elva today..It rode li; /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00917.html (8,422 bytes)
4. RE: 94hp, 1800cc vs 1622cc engine(longish) (score: 1): Author: "Larry Hoy list account" <list@marketvalue.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 09:02:13 -0600; These are basically the same engine, nothing beats cubic inches. The Elva went fast because it was an Elva and not an MG. Compare weights and aerodynamics. Put a B engine in the Elva and it will go e; /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00918.html (7,854 bytes)
5. Re: 94hp, 1800cc vs 1622cc engine(longish) (score: 1): Author: Eric <eric@erickson.on.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 00:52:19 +0930; We had someone drop an oil line and torch his new WRX battling with one of those "pesky Porsches". It was spectacular watching him fly down the straight spewing a jet-tail of burning oil (it took alm; /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00921.html (8,608 bytes)
6. RE: 94hp, 1800cc vs 1622cc engine(longish) (score: 1): Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 08:35:28 -0700; Howard: Bill put it pretty succinctly. There is no substitute for cubic inches. With engines as similar as these (oiling, valvetrain etc.) the only real difference is going to be bore, stroke, and a; /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00923.html (8,916 bytes)
7. Re: 94hp, 1800cc vs 1622cc engine(longish) (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 12:11:11 -0700; It would seem unlikely that there is any inherent superiority either way, as the engine design is identical. More displacement should equal more power, everything else being equal -- and in this case; /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00939.html (9,954 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]