- 1. Re: A type O/D (score: 1)
- Author: "Kai M. Radicke" <kmr@pil.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 17:45:56 -0400
- Not to detract from Nelson's fine work, but there is a far simpler and just as effective method of testing your OD (and gearbox) than building a stand and purchasing a large electric motor to turn i
- /html/6pack/2001-08/msg00164.html (7,577 bytes)
- 2. Re: A type O/D (score: 1)
- Author: Dale Morgan <tpdwinch@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 16:42:13 -0700 (PDT)
- Wouldn't the center out of an old clutch disc welded to your pipe be alot simpler to fabricate then what you went through? Just another look at the horse. Dale Make international calls for as low as
- /html/6pack/2001-08/msg00165.html (8,277 bytes)
- 3. Re: A type O/D (score: 1)
- Author: "Kai M. Radicke" <kmr@pil.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 19:52:56 -0400
- Yes, except then I would have to have a different tool for each type of gearbox I would want to test. The tool was made universal enough for me to use it on Healeys, MGs, Triumphs or whatever else I
- /html/6pack/2001-08/msg00166.html (6,928 bytes)
- 4. Re: A type O/D (score: 1)
- Author: "Nelson Riedel" <nriedel@nextek.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 22:39:06 -0400
- Kai, you're absolutely correct, a drill is a great way to do a quick test on a gearbox & OD. I've used just such an arrangement. My problem was that a drill makes a hell of a racket that can really g
- /html/6pack/2001-08/msg00170.html (7,985 bytes)
- 5. Re: A type O/D (score: 1)
- Author: "Kai M. Radicke" <kmr@pil.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 23:06:20 -0400
- Agreed Nelson, not only does it take a lot of time to hold it for long periods it also turns your forearms into mush! I built a wooden cradle which holds the drill in and upside down position (handl
- /html/6pack/2001-08/msg00171.html (7,084 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu