Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*AOL\s+problems\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*AOL\s+problems\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. RE: AOL problems (score: 1): Author: Chuck Renner <crenner@dynalivery.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 12:04:00 -0500; The problem is that AOL provides handy little buttons for people to click and report messages as spam. But people who have signed up for a mailing list, and don't want to be bothered to actually uns; /html/mgs/2003-08/msg00009.html (7,200 bytes)
2. Re: AOL problems (score: 1): Author: Bullwinkle <yd3@nvc.net>; Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 20:24:38 -0500; Like Dave Council, my email is from my ISP. It uses a McAfee virus system at least. I also have the filters set to max to stop spam and that tripple EX rated material. The mgs and mg-t lists don't ge; /html/mgs/2003-08/msg00110.html (6,688 bytes)
3. AOL problems (score: 1): Author: Ajhsys@aol.com; Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:39:58 EDT; I know that I won't receive any replies from the lists, because it appears AOL is now blocking all messages from autox.team.net. No AOL user is receiving any list mail. Below is the message I sent to; /html/mgs/2003-07/msg00757.html (7,693 bytes)
4. Re: AOL problems (score: 1): Author: David Councill <dcouncil@imt.net>; Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:40:37 -0600; I'm no fan of AOL. But this looks like a feeble but good intentioned response to the spam email problem. I have "real" Internet access but I also now have a spam filter that is set to its maximum str; /html/mgs/2003-07/msg00759.html (9,046 bytes)
5. RE: AOL problems (score: 1): Author: "J R Overcash" <jroverca@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 12:04:21 -0400; Just another reason why I gave up on AOL years ago! Good Luck. Safety Fast! Ross Overcash Ayer, MA USA NAMGBR 2-1172 74B decrepit but running! http://home.earthlink.net/~jroverca/ I know that I won't; /html/mgs/2003-07/msg00760.html (8,425 bytes)
6. Re: AOL problems (score: 1): Author: "Telewest $PH$" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 17:05:53 +0100; Speaking of spam, I hear the American legislature is expected to pass (if not already has) a law that effectively is a spammers charter, requiring recipients to actively 'opt out' of receiving them,; /html/mgs/2003-07/msg00761.html (7,511 bytes)
7. Re: AOL problems (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:18:26 -0700; Don't know where you heard this. Anyway, that is pretty much true, now -- if you can contact them, they have to stop sending to you. The problem is that they never have legitimate return addresses, s; /html/mgs/2003-07/msg00763.html (8,162 bytes)
8. RE: AOL problems (score: 1): Author: Tab Julius <tab@penworks.com>; Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:27:58 -0400; As someone who runs a listserv myself (for a programming language, not car related), I know that occasionally we'd get subscribers who wouldn't receive the list mail, because some filters will block; /html/mgs/2003-07/msg00765.html (7,381 bytes)
9. Re: AOL problems (score: 1): Author: Ajhsys@aol.com; Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 20:19:51 EDT; - - - - - - - - - - No. AOL chose to stop allowing MJBs messages thru. He wrote to all the AOL users and informed them. Apparently they received complaints from people receiving team.net mailings! I; /html/mgs/2003-07/msg00784.html (7,717 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]