- 1. AP- another thought (score: 1)
- Author: guy ankeny <gmankeny@concentric.net>
- Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 19:48:31 -0700
- I see most people in AP, and on the net, have based this "hate" mail towards " the Big Bucks". Unfortunately the reality of the situation is that only possibly 2 other AP competitors could have won i
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg01452.html (7,582 bytes)
- 2. Re: AP- another thought (score: 1)
- Author: Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 22:26:32 -0700
- I think they're mistaken to take that attitude. I didn't see his runs, but anyone who wins their class at Nationals deserves a lot of credit. I just took a look at the Prepared rules, and it doesn't
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg01455.html (8,668 bytes)
- 3. Re: AP- another thought (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 22:49:23 +0100
- I don't see why there can't be a line drawn. We have hundreds of pages of rules to follow. Lots of lines there already. I don't see why there can't be another line added. As to whether that line is
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg01468.html (7,768 bytes)
- 4. Re: AP- another thought (score: 1)
- Author: bruce haden <bhaden@ucsd.edu>
- Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 07:44:21 -0700
- AMEN, and THANK YOU, GUY!!!
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg01493.html (7,785 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu