- 1. Re: AP as viewed from fourth place (score: 1)
- Author: SlyFoxRc@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 12:42:52 EDT
- << Wasn't a Cobra once a factory supported and updated car? Key word in sentence, "once" not a current supported car such as the Porsche. Tracy Sandberg Sly Fox Racing
- /html/autox/1999-10/msg00164.html (6,589 bytes)
- 2. Re: AP as viewed from fourth place (score: 1)
- Author: SlyFoxRc@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 12:44:44 EDT
- << Wasn't a Cobra once a factory supported and updated car? Maybe some Cobras, but not every one. This Porsche is unique and is one of a very few that is a "Factory Works" car. Tracy Sandberg Sly Fox
- /html/autox/1999-10/msg00165.html (6,626 bytes)
- 3. AP as viewed from fourth place (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Holt" <tholt@ccsi.com>
- Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 13:12:10 -0500
- I havn't seen any of the post on the AP protests, but figured I would give my point of view since I probably have the most to gain. I finished fourth, but I think I am technically in third right now.
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg00854.html (10,509 bytes)
- 4. Re: AP as viewed from fourth place (score: 1)
- Author: "George Ryan" <quad4fiero@webzone.net>
- Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 05:46:43 -0500
- Good Job, Tom!!! And everybody on this list thought I was on a rant a few weeks back when it was announced there would be grey and black market cars, and kit cars added to the class next year (Y2K -
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg00886.html (11,937 bytes)
- 5. Re: AP as viewed from fourth place (score: 1)
- Author: Richard Holden <holdenh4@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 13:35:20 -0500
- Well, I'm viewing from one out of the trophies, so I hope at least one of the protests is upheld so I can get my first Nationals trophy like Tom. I am very happy for Tom and would have liked for him
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg00901.html (11,868 bytes)
- 6. Re: AP as viewed from fourth place (score: 1)
- Author: WattPhun@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 03:05:11 EDT
- << The Nagler protest was chicken shit, and at worst he should have been penalized 1 second. maybe even just told to remove it for next year. That would have left the results as they were. I think Na
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg00926.html (8,458 bytes)
- 7. Re: AP as viewed from fourth place (score: 1)
- Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 15:47:43 -0400
- George, I know you're always just looking for a good place to bitch about Prepared rules and such, but I fail to see how bringing FP back again would help with either of these protest situations. Wha
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg00960.html (8,149 bytes)
- 8. Re: AP as viewed from fourth place (score: 1)
- Author: "George Ryan" <quad4fiero@webzone.net>
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 16:37:46 -0500
- Because FP in it's original state was Mazda RX-7, Nissan/Datsun Z cars, Fiero, TVR, etc. All the grey/black market cars, kit cars, & exotics are slated for AP. Give FP it's rightful place for the ro
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg00973.html (9,728 bytes)
- 9. Re: AP as viewed from fourth place (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom_Holt" <tholt@starlight.us.dell.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 17:33:25 -0500
- For what it's worth the Tri Point BMW would be an FP car. Actually I don't remember a single protest in AP or FP in Texas in the six or so years I have been there. Peter Fehn told me that his protest
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg00985.html (9,498 bytes)
- 10. Re: AP as viewed from fourth place (score: 1)
- Author: "George Ryan" <quad4fiero@webzone.net>
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 17:56:43 -0500
- The BMW wasn't multiple seconds ahead of everybody, either!! It is just a good FP car - well driven, I might add, from what I have heard. Isn't that what this sport is all about?? Not who has access
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg00987.html (10,425 bytes)
- 11. Re: AP as viewed from fourth place (score: 1)
- Author: SlyFoxRc@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 19:51:51 EDT
- << I know Peter spotted the belly pan first. He told me and then told his other friends knowing it was technically illegal. >> Don't ya think that disqualification is a little steep for this piece be
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg00994.html (8,998 bytes)
- 12. Re: AP as viewed from fourth place (score: 1)
- Author: "Brad Cox" <coxb@trimofran.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 08:18:00 -0500
- Man, no kidding! All activity ceases when they fire that RX-7 up. It's so loud I just start laughing. Watching them run is always a highlight of my weekend. Between AP and CP, Texas is a FUN place t
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg01041.html (8,713 bytes)
- 13. Re: AP as viewed from fourth place (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 00:17:59 +0100
- I agree that megabucks cars shouldn't be allowed to dominate an amateur sport such as autocross. The Porsche Factory Works RSR 3.8 911 is a good example of such a car. Jeff Winchell http://PonyCar.Ne
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg01338.html (8,744 bytes)
- 14. Re: AP as viewed from fourth place (score: 1)
- Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>
- Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 08:54:30 -0400
- Boy that's a slippery slope......... Ask 10 autocrossers what constitutes a megabucks car and you'll get 10 different answers. Kent Rafferty
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg01347.html (9,103 bytes)
- 15. RE: AP as viewed from fourth place (score: 1)
- Author: "Jodi Fordahl" <soundtire@email.msn.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 13:26:37 -0700
- What difference does cost make in this sport. Many people put as much or more money into their autocross cars as is in the RSR. Try taking a stock 911 and converting it to ASP specs. Or how about a F
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg01409.html (9,706 bytes)
- 16. FW: AP as viewed from fourth place (score: 1)
- Author: "Isley, Jason C." <JIsley@cell1.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 14:00:06 -0700
- There is no way you can put a dollar limit on this sport. Fordahl was not first because he had the most expensive car, that may have helped, but it was because he can drive. A $4000.00 dollar set of
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg01417.html (10,937 bytes)
- 17. Re: AP as viewed from fourth place (score: 1)
- Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 16:05:57 -0500
- much or Don't know about that, but I'm in complete agreement with the concept that it makes no sense to make rules against a car just because of its perceived expense. I also don't know about the spe
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg01418.html (9,883 bytes)
- 18. Re: AP as viewed from fourth place (score: 1)
- Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 14:39:08 -0700
- Gee, how many of us didn't see that one comin? Oh well, at least yer predictable j. sbw
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg01421.html (8,980 bytes)
- 19. Re: AP as viewed from fourth place (score: 1)
- Author: Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 17:36:37 -0700
- Are you saying I'm wrong? What goes around comes around, n'est-ce pas? And you're not? Jay
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg01431.html (8,891 bytes)
- 20. RE: AP as viewed from fourth place (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Forsberg <joeisuzu@halcyon.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 17:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
- so why are they complaining about the cost of the car you drove? it wasnt the most expensive car in the class just the fastest... oh never mind :)
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg01436.html (10,217 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu