Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Ackerman\s+Angle\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Ackerman\s+Angle\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

1. Ackerman Angle (score: 1): Author: "Randall Antosiak" <randya@pacbell.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 10:24:04 -0800; For anyone who has installed the MGB steering arms, how much of an improvement does it make in the steering? My sense is that the steering is heavy only at low speeds with the stock arms. - Randy A.; /html/tigers/2004-11/msg00192.html (7,164 bytes)
2. Re: Ackerman Angle (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@socal.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:24:34 -0800; Although it is known as an "Ackerman Angle" kit, the amount of correction made is minimal, at best. The steering ratio does change, giving quicker response at the expense of heavier steering wheel f; /html/tigers/2004-11/msg00194.html (8,227 bytes)
3. Re: Ackerman Angle (score: 1): Author: Stephen Waybright <gswaybright@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:55:51 -0800 (PST); My impression is that the correction is really more of a geometry and suspension loading issue than it is for correcting "heavy steering." The fact that it goes to a quicker ratio rack would actualy; /html/tigers/2004-11/msg00195.html (7,666 bytes)
4. Re: Ackerman Angle (score: 1): Author: Stephen Waybright <gswaybright@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 12:00:26 -0800 (PST); Aside from moving the rack, don't the longer MGB steering arms used as part of installing Dale's kit compensate as well against the 4 inches (or whatever it really is) misplacement of the rack??? ___; /html/tigers/2004-11/msg00196.html (7,528 bytes)
5. RE: Ackerman Angle (score: 1): Author: "Theo Smit" <theo.smit@dynastream.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:11:33 -0700; Hi Stephen, Partially. What really needs to happen is that the tie-rod balljoints need to be located further outboard relative to the steering spindle axis, and you run into the brake disc long befor; /html/tigers/2004-11/msg00197.html (7,654 bytes)
6. Re: Ackerman Angle (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@socal.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 12:32:44 -0800; From what I can see of the steering geometry, the length of the steering arms effect the steering ratio (turns of steering wheel to road wheel angle change) and not the relationship between the oppo; /html/tigers/2004-11/msg00198.html (8,713 bytes)
7. Re: Ackerman Angle (score: 1): Author: sosnaenergyconsulting <sosnaenergyconsulting@cox.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:45:11 -0800; Erm, well, I wouldn't call it technical expertise, but: I moved my rack back approximately 5" from the stock position. (It's now right under the harmonic balancer). It has about 1/4" clearance from t; /html/tigers/2004-11/msg00199.html (8,566 bytes)
8. Fw: Ackerman Angle (score: 1): Author: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:47:07 -0800; Drat, forgot to delete the trailer... Interesting about ackerman and steering ...seems to pop up at least once a year. Have any of you looked at my web site under the f=ma icon? There is an analysis; /html/tigers/2004-11/msg00200.html (11,825 bytes)
9. Re: Ackerman Angle (score: 1): Author: Larry Paulick <lpaulick@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 16:55:40 -0500; Dave, did you put it on a turntable to see what the change in the ackerman angle was. Also, can you send me pictures off line. I think I have them from before, but can't find them after switching com; /html/tigers/2004-11/msg00221.html (9,169 bytes)
10. Ackerman Angle (score: 1): Author: Larry Paulick <larry.p@erols.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 20:15:17 -0400; Tiger Owner's. Has anyone used the Dale A's Kit for correcting the Ackerman Angle, with a car with posi rear end, and experienced the same problem noted in a previous posting with posi rear end break; /html/tigers/1999-08/msg00160.html (7,329 bytes)
11. Re: Ackerman Angle (score: 1): Author: "Doug Mallory" <rdmallory@earthling.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 10:53:18 -0400; U Racen? (1) 2.5 degrees negative camber (2) Keep your foot out of it until you are pointed in the direction you want to go. (3) Slow down to make the turn you can pick up any time you lost when you; /html/tigers/1999-08/msg00164.html (8,196 bytes)
12. Re: Ackerman Angle (score: 1): Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>; Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 08:50:39 -0700; This must be the posting you are referring to: I have a clutch disk type positraction unit on my Tiger. I installed it about twenty years ago. I've never had quite the experience Cullen had with his; /html/tigers/1999-08/msg00166.html (10,803 bytes)
13. Re: Ackerman Angle (score: 1): Author: "geewhiz@inreach.com" <geewhiz@inreach.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 09:08:26 -0700; For the sake of those of us who are new to the list, could someone list the phone number and address of the shop that sells this Ackerman kit? Thanks! Gerard 65 MKI -- BOB Oil Recovery System: http:/; /html/tigers/1999-08/msg00167.html (12,081 bytes)
14. RE: Ackerman Angle (score: 1): Author: "Fraser, Ron" <Ron.Fraser@usa.xerox.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 12:29:16 -0400; Dale's Restorations Dale Akuszewski 1468 S. Gage St San Bernardino, Ca 92408 Ph # 909 - 799 - 2099 For the sake of those of us who are new to the list, could someone list the phone number and address; /html/tigers/1999-08/msg00168.html (8,128 bytes)
15. RE: Ackerman Angle (score: 1): Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>; Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 09:51:46 -0700; Dale moved a couple of doors down last year. His street number now is: 1482 S. Gage St. The rest is the same. Robert L. Palmer UCSD, Dept. of AMES 619-822-1037 (o) 760-599-9927 (h) rpalmer@ucsd.edu; /html/tigers/1999-08/msg00169.html (8,590 bytes)
16. Re: Ackerman Angle (score: 1): Author: Larry Paulick <larry.p@erols.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 19:01:10 -0400; Bob - The Dale A kit is indeed an adapter to move the Midget R&P back, with MGB steering arms, and alpine tie rod ends. You supply the Midget R&P, MGB steering arms, and Alpine tie rod ends, and some; /html/tigers/1999-08/msg00175.html (7,899 bytes)
17. Re: Ackerman Angle (score: 1): Author: Larry Paulick <larry.p@erols.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 19:06:05 -0400; Thanks Doug. What other alignment specs do you use. I will use this for street and autocross. Car is ground up restoration, with new braking system, 5.0L and T-5, etc. Car out of body shop is 3 weeks; /html/tigers/1999-08/msg00176.html (7,835 bytes)
18. Re: Ackerman Angle (score: 1): Author: "Doug Mallory" <rdmallory@earthling.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 16:20:35 -0400; I put in as much neg. caster as I can get. This is done by adding more shims to the back a frame bolt than the front. The settings I gave are for track only and your tire wear will suffer if you run; /html/tigers/1999-08/msg00195.html (8,423 bytes)
19. Re: Ackerman Angle (score: 1): Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>; Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 15:07:58 -0700; I think I know what you meant to say Doug, maybe not, but what I think you meant was "positive caster", which you get by adding shims to the rear upper A-arm "shock tower" mounting bolt. I might not; /html/tigers/1999-08/msg00198.html (10,232 bytes)
20. Re: Ackerman Angle (score: 1): Author: "geewhiz@inreach.com" <geewhiz@inreach.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 17:26:39 -0700; Amen to that! I was just buying new tires for my Tiger, and all these tire store guys were telling me how I was going to get 60,000 miles on this tire, 70,000 miles on that tire, and so on, and how; /html/tigers/1999-08/msg00203.html (8,732 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]