Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Alignment\s+Specs\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Alignment Specs (score: 1)
Author: PhastPhill@aol.com
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:40:41 EDT
I just rebuilt my front end, urethane bushings from Rick and new fulcrum pins from Doug, and all the rest new, bolts etc. I have alignment specs from org ,and some from Tigersunited web site and my C
/html/tigers/2006-10/msg00056.html (7,408 bytes)

2. Re: Alignment Specs (score: 1)
Author: PhastPhill@aol.com
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:13:03 EDT
Yes flipping the rotor will give you more tie rod end clearance, but won';t really help with the bad angles. that was what we keep looking at, much easier when you have it in your hand then when look
/html/tigers/2006-10/msg00057.html (6,596 bytes)

3. RE: Alignment Specs (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Palmer" <rpalmerbob@adelphia.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 08:17:28 -0700
Phil - Opinions abound on this subject, but your pick of camber (-0.5) and caster (+4) in my experience are about right for the street. More caster will improve handling, and the only downside is inc
/html/tigers/2006-10/msg00058.html (7,189 bytes)

4. Re: Alignment Specs (score: 1)
Author: MWood24020@aol.com
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 12:53:51 EDT
I run more negative camber (at least -1.2, I settled on -1.5), it won't hurt wear (given zero toe) enough to notice and will make a significant difference in front grip. More caster is also a GOOD th
/html/tigers/2006-10/msg00059.html (6,773 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu