Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*All\s+Hail\s+Mighty\s+GS\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*All\s+Hail\s+Mighty\s+GS\!\s*$/: 31 ]

Total 31 documents matching your query.

1. Re: All Hail Mighty GS! (score: 1): Author: "Donald R McKenna" <donbarbmckenna@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 15:35:33 -0800; Boy, I wish I could come up with a good (convincing) explanation. Maybe they were just fast! Don; /html/ba-autox/2001-02/msg00016.html (8,222 bytes)
2. Re: All Hail Mighty GS! (score: 1): Author: Jesus Villarreal <jesvilla@gte.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 17:25:45 -0800; Here's a good explanation. THE SURFACE STILL SUCKS--BIG TIME!!!!! When suposedly low horsepower cars(GS) beat SS and AS cars, and they didn't miss beating ESP by much either, then there is something; /html/ba-autox/2001-02/msg00021.html (8,683 bytes)
3. Re: All Hail Mighty GS! (score: 1): Author: Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 17:09:48 -0800; I guess ASP isn't counted as high HP. Jeffrey Gordon, in his RX7T, turned fifth fastest time of day overall. Forget the index, that's soft for GS, at least. Jesus, I don't remember seeing your name o; /html/ba-autox/2001-02/msg00022.html (9,728 bytes)
4. RE: All Hail Mighty GS! (score: 1): Author: "Michael R. Clements" <mrc01@flash.net>; Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 17:46:25 -0800; Is a better P/W ratio really the _only_ advantage that SS cars have? They also tend to be better balanced with a lower CG than GS. That should equate to more nimble even under impaired traction! Many; /html/ba-autox/2001-02/msg00023.html (9,451 bytes)
5. Re: All Hail Mighty GS! (score: 1): Author: Jesus Villarreal <jesvilla@gte.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 18:06:22 -0800; I'll agree on the calmer approach to do well at that site, Jeffreys RX7tt is not as high on HP as other ASP cars can be, like Campbells Viper and I'll bet he didn't use 1/4 throttle on his last run(; /html/ba-autox/2001-02/msg00024.html (9,678 bytes)
6. Re: All Hail Mighty GS! (score: 1): Author: Jesus Villarreal <jesvilla@gte.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 18:10:55 -0800; Yes, there were some very talented drivers in GS this Sunday, nothing against any of them, I have alot of respect for all of them. There were some pretty good drivers in SS and the other classes too.; /html/ba-autox/2001-02/msg00025.html (8,454 bytes)
7. Re: All Hail Mighty GS! (score: 1): Author: kirk <kmeline@fastpointcom.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 18:41:54 -0800; The GS did have a great day as we all agree. The reason for this is just in my opinion. The GS cars have very sloppy suspensions for the street and do not get affected much at the tire level by being; /html/ba-autox/2001-02/msg00028.html (8,277 bytes)
8. Re: All Hail Mighty GS! (score: 1): Author: James Creasy <black94pgt@pacbell.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 18:56:32 -0800; you guys are harsh! those are some good GS drivers!!! givem a little credit (and a soft pax =)) back and forth on a but my car vibrates so much on that surface that its kinda hard to see, much less F; /html/ba-autox/2001-02/msg00030.html (10,292 bytes)
9. RE: All Hail Mighty GS! (score: 1): Author: "Navid Kahangi" <navid@interwoven.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 19:08:04 -0800; The only other non-GS time in the top 8 PAX times was 3rd and it belonged to a shifter kart. You can't get any stiffer suspension than no suspension at all. How do you explain that then? --Navid --Or; /html/ba-autox/2001-02/msg00031.html (9,599 bytes)
10. RE: All Hail Mighty GS! (score: 1): Author: George Chiou <george_chiou@bellsport.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 19:00:12 -0800; Anybody remember Carlos Gomez from last year in GS [sic] rookie? PAXing top 10 most everytime he ran, uh, in street tires? -Geo; /html/ba-autox/2001-02/msg00032.html (8,306 bytes)
11. RE: All Hail Mighty GS! (score: 1): Author: Andy McKee <andrewmckee@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 19:29:31 -0800 (PST); Carts are small and take a tight line. That was where it was cleanest. They're actually small enough they could probably maneuver around in the clean area, where a larger car would quickly be in the; /html/ba-autox/2001-02/msg00034.html (10,445 bytes)
12. Re: All Hail Mighty GS! (score: 1): Author: kirk <kmeline@fastpointcom.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 20:27:36 -0800; A Kart is not a car. We are talking about cars here. No comparison. Kirk; /html/ba-autox/2001-02/msg00036.html (9,871 bytes)
13. Re: All Hail Mighty GS! (score: 1): Author: kirk <kmeline@fastpointcom.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 20:33:05 -0800; You are totally proving my hypothesis. And I would also like to say that I am not trying to take away any congratulations due to the GS cars. They deserve their KUDOS. Remember, stiffer is not alway; /html/ba-autox/2001-02/msg00037.html (10,779 bytes)
14. RE: All Hail Mighty GS! (score: 1): Author: "Navid Kahangi" <navid@interwoven.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 20:44:42 -0800; That's a very logical and thoughtful answer Kirk, but I think I'll go with Andy's explanation. Tiny size, clean line, more traction, makes sense. --Navid A Kart is not a car. We are talking about car; /html/ba-autox/2001-02/msg00038.html (10,359 bytes)
15. Re: All Hail Mighty GS! (score: 1): Author: kirk <kmeline@fastpointcom.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:06:42 -0800; Just to summarize the cars. The IS300 is at about 3270 curb weight and the Integras are at about 2800 or 2900. That's not tiny. Clean lines are caused by a good driver. Alot of good drivers had clea; /html/ba-autox/2001-02/msg00041.html (11,432 bytes)
16. All Hail Mighty GS! (score: 1): Author: "Thana, Peter {High~Palo Alto}" <PETER.THANA@Roche.COM>; Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:22:49 -0800; Geeez, GS PAX'ed 1,2,4,5,6,7,8. That's not including WRGs, which would have made it 10 of the top 11. The fastest scratch time from the entire AS/BS/CS group would have placed 3rd in GS. It really wa; /html/ba-autox/2001-01/msg00614.html (7,704 bytes)
17. Re: All Hail Mighty GS! (score: 1): Author: "James Creasy" <jcre@mozart.com>; Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:46:01 -0800; and fastest times were the carts 1,2,3,4 (one errant rx7 at 5), then OSP why am i in OSP???? :( -james have AS/BS/CS; /html/ba-autox/2001-01/msg00615.html (8,118 bytes)
18. RE: All Hail Mighty GS! (score: 1): Author: "Navid Kahangi" <navid@interwoven.com>; Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:48:13 -0800; Don't forget, they were even faster than a pretty good SS group. They must have taken a couple of turns out for that run group :). --Navid Geeez, GS PAX'ed 1,2,4,5,6,7,8. That's not including WRGs, w; /html/ba-autox/2001-01/msg00617.html (8,285 bytes)
19. RE: All Hail Mighty GS! (score: 1): Author: "Chin, Elbert {Chem~Palo Alto}" <ELBERT.CHIN@Roche.COM>; Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:55:29 -0800; I thought that SFR dropped the PAX class for 2001. It seems like they just renamed it as GS!! -Elbert (who managed to PAX 8th Woohoo!! but finished 7th in class Doh!!) Geeez, GS PAX'ed 1,2,4,5,6,7,8.; /html/ba-autox/2001-01/msg00618.html (8,381 bytes)
20. RE: All Hail Mighty GS! (score: 1): Author: "Navid Kahangi" <navid@interwoven.com>; Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:03:03 -0800; Because you can't run your featherweight, monster power car in ES? --Navid and fastest times were the carts 1,2,3,4 (one errant rx7 at 5), then OSP 6,7,8,9,10 why am i in OSP???? :( -james --Original; /html/ba-autox/2001-01/msg00619.html (8,834 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]