Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Aluminium\s+alloy\s+bodywork\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Aluminium\s+alloy\s+bodywork\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Aluminium alloy bodywork (score: 1): Author: Sarah <linda.h@virgin.net>; Date: Sun, 03 Aug 1997 21:02:28 +0100; This isn't strictly a Morgan question but may be of interest to those with cars with aluminium bodywork. In order to help pass the time while I am on the waiting list, I have recently bought a 1953 A; /html/morgans/1997-08/msg00011.html (7,132 bytes)
2. Re: Aluminium alloy bodywork (score: 1): Author: FPS3@aol.com; Date: Tue, 5 Aug 1997 00:10:25 -0400 (EDT); I am assuming that the bonnet is painted on the outside? If it is and you want to leave it aluminium inside... I would scrub it off with fine sandpaper, wet sand it with #320, and apply one of the ne; /html/morgans/1997-08/msg00014.html (7,630 bytes)
3. Re: Aluminium alloy bodywork (score: 1): Author: Martin Kurrein <mograces@mkurrein.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 5 Aug 1997 07:35:52 +0100; Almost certainly aluminium oxide. There are a number of possible solutions but the oxide itself actually forms a semi-protective coating itself. Once the oxide forms it does not (unlike rust on steel; /html/morgans/1997-08/msg00015.html (7,976 bytes)
4. RE: Aluminium alloy bodywork (score: 1): Author: "Vandergraaf, Chuck" <vandergraaft@aecl.ca>; Date: Tue, 5 Aug 1997 11:14:31 -0400; I would tend to agree with Martin that the coating is most likely aluminum oxide which forms a protective coating and passivates the metal. Removing it would be counterproductive because a new oxide; /html/morgans/1997-08/msg00016.html (9,229 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]