Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*An\s+interesting\s+study\s+of\s+bore\s+and\s+stroke\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. An interesting study of bore and stroke (score: 1)
Author: "Freiburger, David" <David.Freiburger@primedia.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:18:27 -0700
Let's assume you've got two big-block Chevys, both with 11.0:1, both with the same solid-roller cam (253/260 at 0.050 on a 111), and both with the same heads, intake, carb, oil pan, and headers. Both
/html/land-speed/2004-06/msg00382.html (8,207 bytes)

2. Re: An interesting study of bore and stroke (score: 1)
Author: Nt788@aol.com
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:41:35 EDT
No answers just comments. To hard for me! Jack
/html/land-speed/2004-06/msg00384.html (7,996 bytes)

3. RE: An interesting study of bore and stroke (score: 1)
Author: Dale.Clay@mdhelicopters.com
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:09:35 -0700
OOOOHH This could get good! Dale Clay BTW I like the new HR format. Let's assume you've got two big-block Chevys, both with 11.0:1, both with the same solid-roller cam (253/260 at 0.050 on a 111), an
/html/land-speed/2004-06/msg00387.html (9,099 bytes)

4. Re: An interesting study of bore and stroke (score: 1)
Author: "John Burk" <joyseydevil@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:04:14 -0400
Two points - There's a fair difference between a rod ratio of 1.53 and 1.63 and the unshrouding effect of increasing the bore .270" helps the 4.55 bore motor - I'd bet the short stroke motor loses 2%
/html/land-speed/2004-06/msg00389.html (8,205 bytes)

5. FW: An interesting study of bore and stroke (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:33:58 -0400
I will bite on this just to have some fun but you have to send back what you found and why you think it worked that way as well.. I would intuitively guess that the shorter stroke bigger bore engine
/html/land-speed/2004-06/msg00390.html (10,536 bytes)

6. Re: An interesting study of bore and stroke (score: 1)
Author: "John Beckett" <saltracer@servusa.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:34:31 -0400
Would bet it's already making 2% more HP at 5000. 1.63 bore at
/html/land-speed/2004-06/msg00392.html (8,888 bytes)

7. Re: An interesting study of bore and stroke (score: 1)
Author: Doug Odom <dlodom@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:52:53 -0700
David, Here is my guess. Obviously the same camshaft would not be proper for both strokes. I don't even think its the right one for either stroke, but that just my opinion. Both motors would make abo
/html/land-speed/2004-06/msg00404.html (9,383 bytes)

8. Re: An interesting study of bore and stroke (score: 1)
Author: "Freiburger, David" <David.Freiburger@primedia.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:04:00 -0700
I'm serious about this study and would like to go deeper. What makes the 253/260-at-.050 cam wrong for both engines? What would be your choice of an optimum cam for the 4.250-inch-stroke engine? How
/html/land-speed/2004-06/msg00407.html (10,176 bytes)

9. An interesting study of bore and stroke (score: 1)
Author: "3liter" <saltfever@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:34:22 -0700
Well, David there are so many variables and unknowns it would be impossible to do it justice here. And besides I am not willing to write an epistle on the subject. The motors you describe are, mid-ra
/html/land-speed/2004-06/msg00416.html (9,397 bytes)

10. RE: An interesting study of bore and stroke (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 06:06:59 -0400
You can not make an intelligent cam selection without knowing a lot about the cylinder heads.. so having identical ones is interesting but not quantitative.. There is a big difference between an old
/html/land-speed/2004-06/msg00418.html (9,533 bytes)

11. RE: An interesting study of bore and stroke (score: 1)
Author: John Goodman <ggl205@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 05:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
"You can not make an intelligent cam selection without knowing a lot about the cylinder heads (and the rest of the rotating assembly as well).. so having identical ones is interesting but not quantit
/html/land-speed/2004-06/msg00431.html (9,302 bytes)

12. Re: An interesting study of bore and stroke (score: 1)
Author: "John Beckett" <saltracer@servusa.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:13:25 -0400
What about the CNC Edelbrock or Dart heads? Any place we could get comparable flow numbers with the AFR's? JB for lift
/html/land-speed/2004-06/msg00482.html (9,507 bytes)

13. An interesting study of bore and stroke (score: 1)
Author: Daniel Wright <daniel.wright@genetics.utah.edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:40:28 -0600
I ran this information thru the Desktop Dyno computer program. I got the following information, which should be regarded as Desktop Dyno's Opinion. The Long Stroke (LS) version made slightly more to
/html/land-speed/2004-06/msg00485.html (9,949 bytes)

14. An interesting study of bore and stroke (score: 1)
Author: Daniel Wright <daniel.wright@genetics.utah.edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:53:13 -0600
In selecting the unspecified components, such as heads, intake, carb, oil pan, and headers, I made very conservative choices from the basic default selections available.If I swap ONLY the heads I se
/html/land-speed/2004-06/msg00488.html (10,613 bytes)

15. Re: An interesting study of bore and stroke (score: 1)
Author: "John Beckett" <saltracer@servusa.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:57:53 -0400
I think your analysis is current, but the HP is off a tad. JB
/html/land-speed/2004-06/msg00490.html (8,352 bytes)

16. RE: An interesting study of bore and stroke (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:58:24 -0400
555 BBC 4.25 stroke long rod 9.8/1 C/R dart 360 cnc ported heads 2.3 intake hyd roller 240 @ 050 dart single plane intake motec efi msd 7 34 degrees lead 92 octane 750 ft lbs 735 hp
/html/land-speed/2004-06/msg00493.html (10,646 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu