Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*And\s+you\s+thought\s+we\s+had\s+it\s+tough\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*And\s+you\s+thought\s+we\s+had\s+it\s+tough\.\.\.\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. And you thought we had it tough... (score: 1): Author: "Lawrence Wright" <wrightsinseabrook@msn.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 12:40:04 -0400; I usually get a reaction when I show people the access to the #8 spark plug on the Tiger; either it's a brilliant solution to an engineering problem, or an amateurish cover-up of a design flaw. Well,; /html/tigers/2004-08/msg00177.html (8,403 bytes)
2. Re: And you thought we had it tough... (score: 1): Author: "Tom Witt" <wittsend@jps.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 10:35:52 -0700; Which leaves one to wonder why most V-8's have a rear mounted distributor in the first place. Is it simply because early cars likely had firewall mounted coils? Is it because a rear sump allowed for; /html/tigers/2004-08/msg00178.html (7,937 bytes)
3. Re: And you thought we had it tough... (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@socal.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 11:50:25 -0700; You know, from reading TBON, that Chrysler did try to get their V-8 under a new model, which never saw any production. From Chrysler's ACTUAL history, if they had kept Rootes alive, the Tiger would; /html/tigers/2004-08/msg00182.html (9,993 bytes)
4. RE: And you thought we had it tough... (score: 1): Author: "Theo Smit" <theo.smit@dynastream.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 13:57:45 -0600; Hi Steve, At least the 1500 cc Japanese engine would have kept its oil inside. The rigidity and metallurgical properties of the Japanese engine blocks of the late 60's and early 70's (specifically th; /html/tigers/2004-08/msg00183.html (8,615 bytes)
5. Re: And you thought we had it tough... (score: 1): Author: Drmoonstone@aol.com; Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 17:03:24 EDT; Another interesting tidbit and Ford related is about the early Pintos. Overhead cam could only be changed by removing head or making hole in dash. In the early engines the came out of the back. Later; /html/tigers/2004-08/msg00185.html (7,252 bytes)
6. Re: And you thought we had it tough... (score: 1): Author: DJoh797014@aol.com; Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 22:06:34 EDT; Removing the cam from a Ranger with the 2.3 mighty 4 is just as bad. The cam is too long to clear the front of the engine. You must pull the radiator or lift the engine. Been there, done that. Dave J; /html/tigers/2004-08/msg00189.html (7,261 bytes)
7. Re: And you thought we had it tough... (score: 1): Author: Drmoonstone@aol.com; Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:34:11 EDT; Seems that Ford had many great inventions. Moonstone; /html/tigers/2004-08/msg00198.html (7,167 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]