Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Announcing\.\.\.\s+MGA\/C\s+Lists\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Announcing\.\.\.\s+MGA\/C\s+Lists\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Announcing... MGA/C LISTS (score: 1): Author: Skye Poier <skye@hoth.ffwd.bc.ca>; Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 10:53:49 -0700; Well the yea's have it. While I agree that the overlap is considerable, there seems to be enough interest and certainly enough traffic to warrant a new list or two. These lists are intended to be a c; /html/mgs/1998-04/msg01063.html (8,634 bytes)
2. Re: Announcing... MGA/C LISTS (score: 1): Author: Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca>; Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 15:25:27 -0400; History being what it is, this is usually how the death of ALL the lists begin. Keep it all together, please. Fragmentation is the beginning of the end. -- Trevor Boicey, Ottawa, Canada. tboicey@brit; /html/mgs/1998-04/msg01073.html (7,925 bytes)
3. Re: Announcing... MGA/C LISTS (score: 1): Author: Kevin Sullivan <kevins@khoral.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 14:00:07 -0600 (MDT); I don't think there's anything wrong with the mgs list. There's not enough A and C stuff the bug the Bs and the B stuff is easily deleted by those who aren't interested. Kevin Sullivan kevins@khoral.; /html/mgs/1998-04/msg01079.html (8,333 bytes)
4. re: Announcing... MGA/C Lists (score: 1): Author: "Joe R. Koster" <jkoster@ncpi.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 15:14:20 -0500; I think there is nothing wrong with the original list. If everyone would put something about there message in the subject spot so that if it doesn't spark your interest then you can delete the messag; /html/mgs/1998-04/msg01082.html (7,671 bytes)
5. Re: Announcing... MGA/C LISTS (score: 1): Author: "Kai Radicke" <mowogmg@pil.net>; Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 16:11:16 -0400; Damn right. IMHO, it is fine to start a list to cover a separate topic/issue or a new topic/issue. However having lists that cover redundant issues and topics is asinine. (btw this puts my list subsc; /html/mgs/1998-04/msg01083.html (8,432 bytes)
6. Re: Announcing... MGA/C LISTS (score: 1): Author: Skye Poier <skye@hoth.ffwd.bc.ca>; Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 14:42:37 -0700; Well lets not panic quite yet. We're all entitled to an opinion on the subject. Lets see how it goes in the next couple weeks and if its of no use to anyone it makes no difference to me to shut them; /html/mgs/1998-04/msg01090.html (7,967 bytes)
7. Re: Announcing... MGA/C LISTS (score: 1): Author: Ben Ruset <bruset@home.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 18:23:51 -0400; I have to agree with Kai and Trevor (never thought I'd say that!!) - I think this is not a hot idea. BEN RUSET - ICQ # 10364973 The MGB Haven & MG Cars Webring http://members.home.com/mgbhaven; /html/mgs/1998-04/msg01096.html (8,173 bytes)
8. Re: Announcing... MGA/C LISTS (score: 1): Author: "John Hardy" <hardwire@webleicester.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 23:34:58 +0100; They're quite right. The more the lists fragment the less traffic there is. The first 2 weeks will show initial enthusiasm..........the damage will be done over the next few months as the special nee; /html/mgs/1998-04/msg01097.html (8,323 bytes)
9. Re: Announcing... MGA/C LISTS (score: 1): Author: stuart farmer <k7wf@kalama.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 06:29:36 -0700; I agree....Keep it the way it is. I just read what interests me and glance at the rest. I find most articles (questions & answers) very enlightening. Please don't split us up. We deserve one another; /html/mgs/1998-04/msg01122.html (8,871 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]