Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Another\s+physics\s+question\s+$now\s+fat\s+tires$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Another\s+physics\s+question\s+$now\s+fat\s+tires$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Another physics question (now fat tires) (score: 1): Author: Bob MGT <BobMGT@aol.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Jan 1998 23:53:51 EST; So how does this apply to handling vs tire width? I have a running argument with some of my buddies about this. I maintain that wide tires don't improve handling all that much, and I use the coeffici; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg02004.html (7,701 bytes)
2. Re: Another physics question (now fat tires) (score: 1): Author: Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca>; Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 00:17:32 -0500; Again, the coefficient of friction only applies to smooth surface on smooth surface. The pavement is not smooth and the rubber is soft, so the rubber protrudes into the pavement and vice versa. This; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg02006.html (7,709 bytes)
3. Re: Another physics question (now fat tires) (score: 1): Author: DANMAS <DANMAS@aol.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 01:45:58 EST; improve But Bob, Wide tires do indeed improve the handling ability of the cars, very much indeed! It all has to do with the shape of the footprint. As someone else noted on this thread, the number of; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg02014.html (9,904 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]