Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Anti\-Sway\s+bars\s+and\s+MGBs\,\s+OOPS\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Anti\-Sway\s+bars\s+and\s+MGBs\,\s+OOPS\!\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Anti-Sway bars and MGBs, OOPS! (score: 1): Author: phile@pwcs.stpaul.gov (Philip J Ethier); Date: Mon, 31 Aug 92 8:26:51 CDT; \IMHO these tires are too wide for the 5.5" wheels. They are at 65% and I never \like to run below 70%. 195s would be OK, at 72%, but 185-60-14 really work \well at 75.5%. My buddy Brian autocrosses; /html/british-cars/1992-08/msg00582.html (7,396 bytes)
2. Anti-Sway bars and MGBs, OOPS! (score: 1): Author: brucec@amex-trs.com (Bruce Carter); Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 16:58:35 -0700; Phile scribed:> \IMHO these tires are too wide for the 5.5" wheels. They are at 65% and I never \like to run below 70%. 195s would be OK, at 72%, but 185-60-14 really work \well at 75.5%. My buddy Br; /html/british-cars/1992-08/msg00598.html (7,812 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]